Search results

Stop being a hypocrite and deal with your own recalcitrance. There you go again. It is what it is. That says nothing. That is not an explanation for what it means to be dead in sin. Being dead in sin does not equate to being unable to do anything, including being unable to repent and put one's...

It's so funny to see you criticize Futurism (rightly so) while at the same time believing in things that are promoted by Futurism, such as the idea of a future individual Antichrist and a future physical temple in Jerusalem where the abomination of desolation would supposedly take place. A...

He is just like most other dispensationalists in that way. Incapable of making any coherent arguments using scripture. He thinks his own words are equivalent to God's word. Sad.

It says the people of the prince destroyed the city and the sanctuary and that happened in 70 AD, so the prince cannot possibly be some future antichrist. The prince has to be someone who was the prince of the people who destroyed the city and the sanctuary at the time that it happened. There is...

That proves absolutely nothing when it comes to Daniel 9:24-27. You need to slow down and think about what you're saying before posting. You said "2 weeks and 67 weeks" You mean 7 weeks and 62 weeks. And you said "490 of captivity"? You mean 70 years of captivity. Start over and read what the...

Nope. You are very delusional if you think saying "dead is dead" is a legitimate way of describing what being dead in sins means. LOL. Keep pretending as if you know me. You think you are God. You are not. LOL. recalcitrant (adjective): having an obstinately uncooperative attitude, especially...

It is, as I have shown. Unlike you, I have shown that Paul was referring to both believers and unbelievers in Romans 14:10-12 because he referenced Isaiah 45:22-24 in relation to the judgment seat of Christ and that passage includes those who are incensed against Him as being among those who...

I never said otherwise. This is a waste of time because you're just talking to a strawman instead of me. I'm done with this discussion.

There is no difference. I am showing that unbelievers will be standing before the judgment seat of Christ, but you are too blinded by your false doctrine to see it. Matthew 25:31-46 clearly portrays both believers and unbelievers standing before Christ for judgment. You are denying the obvious here.

Thank you for confirming that you don't want to be taken seriously. No one said anything about a believer not being saved. In Romans 14:10-12 Paul references Isaiah 45:22-24 which shows that unbelievers also will be bowing before Christ to confess that He is Lord. Just as Paul indicated here as...

Goodness gracious. You have a serious reading comprehension problem. I didn't say anything about any who are born again being condemned. Obviously, only unbelievers are condemned. Do you not understand that judgment results in either rewards or condemnation? Do you actually think I was saying...

LOL! I did explain it already and you said to give verses only. Make up your mind! LOL! Can I find anyone here who wants to be taken seriously?

How can that be the only part of Daniel that has been fulfilled? That makes no sense. For example, you don't think any of Daniel 2 is fulfilled despite Daniel telling King Nebuchadnezzar that he was the head of gold in his dream and mentioned that three other kingdoms would follow his (the...

How do you figure that "everlasting righteousness" will be brought in when Jesus returns when you also believe that some unrighteousness will occur after that during the thousand years and a whole lot of unrighteousness after that during Satan's little season? If you're going to interpret...

Yes, they are the same great city, but it is not Jerusalem. Jesus was not crucified in Jerusalem. John 19:20 Many of the Jews read this sign, for the place where Jesus was crucified was near the city, and the sign was written in Aramaic, Latin and Greek. Hebrews 3:12 The high priest carries...

It's amazing to see how dispensationalists go out of their way to get around the fact that a determined time period of 70 weeks (490 years) was decreed for the prophecy to be fulfilled. Dispensationalists think they have the authority to change the fulfillment of the 70th week to some...

So, you put a gap between the end of the first 7 weeks and beginning of the next 62 weeks (between the 7th and 8th weeks) then the way you do between the 69th and 70th weeks? Just because they are listed separately implies there is a gap of time between them? That's quite a stretch.

According to scripture the last days began long ago already. Peter referred to what was going on during the day of Pentecost long ago as being part of the last days that Joel prophesied about in Joel 2:28-32. The last days began long ago and continue up until the last day when Jesus returns, the...

What evidence do you have to indicate that Zechariah 8:23 has anything to do with a time period following the return of Christ? None. You have nothing at all to back up your Premil belief except for a mistaken chronological reading of Revelation 19 and 20. Does it not concern you that nothing...

LOL. I just laid out the truth, but you are apparently too closed minded to consider it, as evidenced by the fact that you didn't even attempt to address anything I said about it. Maybe someday you will. Yes, it does. Your twisting of the text to make it say that you want to say is...