Search results

There is no choice in the matter. sml Impossible. The forces of darkness have been arrayed against the work of the Holy Spirit from the beginning. Therefore, the HS works through entrenched opposition. And the objective, measurable success? Christianity is the largest religion in the world...

The FBI has 9 departments. Federal Bureau of Investigation - Wikipedia

This vid explores the double standards women exploit; OTOH, the are aggressors in conflict, to prove they are ‘strong;’ then, when called to account, they invoke victim status. Toxic.

You’re not the first to rebuke her MO. It’s the JW way.

The only motive to accept such nonsense is IDOLATRY. Sad how common accepting this nonsense is in Christiandom.

Nice try to equate unrelated passages. Peter’s fate has nothing to do with John’s fate. Not the case in the topic under discussion. As @MA2444 shared, her happiness and even life hang in the balance and far more importantly, his family, as a whole. Discernment.

Agreed. Again, you and @Mink57 are doing worse than re-interpreting. You are reading exceptions into unconditional commands BECAUSE of your ego, BECAUSE of your agenda. Let me give you a simple example. I have a boss at work and if I don’t follow his directions, I can be terminated. To escape...

Bearing false witness

It does t have to say that word; the absence of conditions TELLS YOU it is unconditional. ROFLMAO.

Even worse, there are 18 intelligence agencies. Members of the IC

Victim mentality. You are desperate to allow an exception to undermine the unconditional rule. Guess what? No command in Scripture is conditional.

1 Peter 3:1-2 Wives In the same way, you wives must accept the authority of your husbands. Then, even if some refuse to obey the Good News, your godly lives will speak to them without any words. They will be won over 2 by observing your pure and reverent lives.

You are reading into the text, assuming why there is separation. The text says NOTHING about the choice being achieved by over-ruling her husbands directions. It's hilarious that you are willfully ignorant of a command lacking qualifications and conditions is unqualified and unconditional...

Doesn't sound like you were a very good helper in helping to defend him. You and @Mink57 like to have it both ways. Pick one: I can help protect my husband because I am brave and strong, like him. I am a victim and must cower in fear when my husband is threatened, and use my children as a...

Implied in her being required by God to submit to him.

I report. You decide. Try answering my question. Only then, can your post be properly construed. Thanks!

It most certainly does! The absence of conditions implies unconditional. You know this. We’ve been over this before.

Your opinion. Where does Scripture say wives are to judge their husbands? ROFLMAO. Women's ego is so big, we cannot even acknowledge it.

Is this a sexist failing or are women guilty of this as well?