Search results

Cop out response. If it was true you would be able to show us where it indicates as such. This response proves that you are just making things up...again.

Show us where it says that Jesus came to Stephen personally when he died.

He's hiding that he's part of some cult that denies the deity of Christ.

They were very valid questions that you foolishly can't answer because of your foolish denial of the deity of Christ.

Jesus, as God, was not made and had no beginning. He created all things. You foolishly deny this and no one should take you seriously at all. Colossians 1:15 He is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn over all creation. 16 For by Him all things were created that are in heaven and that...

Nope. John 5:22 For the Father judges no one, but has committed all judgment to the Son, Revelation 22:12 And behold, I am coming quickly, and My reward is with Me, to give to every one according to his work. Matthew 25:31-46 clearly shows Jesus judging everyone, not the Father. The goats are...

I already explained how I understand the word. The Greek word can also mean "firstfruit". It indicates that Christ Himself is the firstfruits or firstfruit "of them that slept" (of the dead in Christ). In that verse it is used to show that Christ's resurrection ensures that "them that slept"...

Obviously. Agree. And I honestly don't know why that is the case. I think 1 Corinthians 15:20-23 is pretty straightforward, yet they are not even close to understanding it correctly.

Not only that, but he also denies the future glorious bodily second coming of Jesus Christ. This guy is part of some cult, but I'm not sure which one. Maybe his own one man cult.

I don't do that. Any other lies that you want to make up?

LOL! This is utter nonsense. You act like the most highly symbolic book in the Bible is all literal. You guys have no idea how ridiculous you come across. Hilarious. Unbelievable.

No sense in going over this several more times. You go ahead and interpret the most highly symbolic book in the entire Bible as literally as possible if you insist. It's a foolish approach to interpreting the book, resulting in a lot of nonsense. It's a wonder that you recognize that Revelation...

If you think you and him are not lacking in discernment as it relates to 1 Corinthians 15:20-23, then how about addressing what I said in post #86 and show that? It seems that all you can ever do anymore is divert attention by bringing up other topics instead of addressing the topic at hand.

Do you think Ezekiel 28 refers to Adam, as TribulationSigns claims? Where does scripture indicate that Adam ever claimed to be a god or that Adam was the anointed cherub who covers or that he was ever condemned by God the way Ezekiel 28 describes? Scripture never speaks of Adam in that way. Why...

That verse, 1 Corinthians 15:28, relates directly to verses 22-27. So, the timing of that verse relates to the time when Jesus comes again which Paul says will bring in "the end, when he shall have delivered up the kingdom to God, even the Father; when he shall have put down all rule and all...

That is not talking about taking pieces of a completed, hardened potter's vessel and reshaping it. That's talking about reshaping it before it has been hardened. The scriptural text is talking about a finished, hardened potter's vessel being shattered into many pieces. It's a picture of...

You again find it laughable that these two imaginary individuals would defy Christ's command to love their enemies by killing them. Can you explain why you try to interpret the most highly symbolic book in the Bible as literally as you possibly can? Do you think that's a wise approach? Clearly...

You consider Christ's command to love our enemies to be laughable. How foolish. We are to love our enemies, not take vengeance on them. Vengeance is the Lord's, not ours. You continue to contradict scripture with your nonsense. You are completely missing the symbolism in Revelation 11 because...

Where does the Revelation 16 passage say anything about the two witnesses? Nowhere, of course. It talks about an angel bringing the plagues, not the two witnesses. But, details like that obviously mean nothing to you because you insist on just believing whatever you want to believe whether it's...

The Greek word translated there as "world" is "aion". Other translations translate the word as "age". It's a word related to time, not different worlds. In that passage, Jesus was comparing a time during which people get married and they die to an age to come during which people will no longer...