Search results

The inequality of divorce as explained by a divorce attorney. Women have special rights that men do not have access to. Said differently, men's responsibilities in marriage is enforced by law. Women's responsibilities are not. For instance, he provides resources, she provides compassion and sex...

Circular Reasoning. You are taking something that is NOT the NT as a higher authority than what the NT says, i.e.., subordinating something of higher authority to something of lower authority. Because of this, we disagree. From this, you conclude the NT is insufficient. Frankly, I don't care...

How did you come to this conclusion? Supposing one knows better than the translators what is the better source materials seems suspicious to me.

Including the REV? I've seen that too, although I'm less inclined to call gender language an error. Cultural changes inevitably show up in translations because culture and language are inherently evolving. Regarding fornication being removed; do you mean the word or the idea?

Re-read post #22.

This is patently untrue, as I've already explained, even though often repeated.

By contrast to the Vietnam Wall, there is this amazing achievement. The 3rd Shock Army’s Female Snipers, 1st Belorussian Front, 1945 Over 2,000 female snipers served in the Russian military during the war, and they quickly gained a reputation for their deadly accuracy and fearless tactics...

I'm not aware of too many versions that are based on other versions. Perhaps that's what they did in centuries past? Nowadays, the original source material is available, along with a much better understanding of not only ancient language but the 21st century American that is best to translate...

Not sure who is claiming everything was written down? However, after 66 books, I trust the important things were identified. Why don't you?

Because I don't waste my time on less authoritatve references when higher authoritative references are available.

Just trying to understand your claim that it is another thing if the container is sin. And these questions reveal the implications of your statement.

I asked questions. If you cannot answer them, that's on you.

Why would you rely on writings from 200 years after the event rather than eye witnesses to the event?

Nope. They need to learn also these nationalist documents in unison because both, the Bible and these Founding documents, along with the Pledge, continue to guide civil discourse. Put differently, what guide should be taught to children for them to engage in civil discourse?

I think this is a great way to roll out the change. Couch the roll out as elite, something to covet. This is the secular equivalent to holy, for it establishes a non-equal treatment. This goes against what I call THE PERVERSION OF EQUALITY. IF the woke Left were consistent, they would demand...

REV

If it matters to particular parents, they are free to have their child attend a private school that discriminates along those lines. Also, the relationship between subject matter and what the teacher believes about it applies to all subjects, especially history.

I submit that an education lacking religious grounding is incomplete, at best, and nefarious, at worst.

Nope. Not one little bit. Rather, I wholeheartedly support it with one caveat. I prefer a modern translation.

God, the Father, is my favorite character in the Bible, bar none. His servant Jesus, I actually relate to less. Perhaps that will change with the 2nd Coming.