Search results

<sigh> You seem willfully ignorant. ‘Spiritual’ is not a type of language usage. Topics can be spiritual but not language. Language is either literal or figurative. It’s really simple. Can’t do it. There is a dichotomy of language. Literal or figurative. Consult an English book. There is a...

While I appreciate your assessment of my question, I’d appreciate even more that you provide an actual, literal answer. LOL. Does that imply you do not see the figurative? And more importantly, are you admitting that they can be both spiritual and figurative? That it is only ego (flesh) that...

1. IDEAL -v- PRACTICAL REALITY: Typical of all Leftist ideologies, totally succumbed to the Nirvana fallacy of ideal perfection. In the real world there is no perfection. 2. FRUIT: And what fruit has the divinely inspired merit system of Patriarchy yielded? The benefits of civilization...

Then why are equalitists-feminists giving themselves priority seating in the equality goals?

Because men aren't feminists so much.

Not at all. This statement is the worst form of feminism, COMPETITIVE feminism. How you rationalize accepting inequality when it suits you is very creative.

That's a fact, not indicative of victim mentality.

It’s not funny at all because reality: we aren’t victims and DO take responsibility. Not only is it not the same thing, it is the EXACT OPPOSITE. This just goes to show the feminists idea of equality is totally perverted.

Boy, you really seem to avoid answering questions on principle. If someone asked me if I was a Christian, I would simply answer yes. I wouldn't reply with an Ad Homenim. Below is another question that evaded your keen insight.

And the brain washed believe it.

This is one of my all-time favorite posts!

The shift is related to debating how evil evil feminism is to understanding God's word. :D Why can't it be both? Ever see a Venn diagram? Not sure why you ask this question but it really is besides the point I made about inequality, i.e., no parallel verse for husbands. Why does figurative...

The first sentence, sex without committment, is how feminism seduces men. When I was a young Chad, I thought feminism was great. Not sure what women got out of it, but I thought it was great for the purposes of low cost sex. A young man said young women today are whore's. He stays away from such...

Talking to Mink is like talking to the wall or a robot that repeats, "I'm a victim and will not take any responsibility." Although she says she's in her 60's, her writing comes off as a petulant teen.

Narcissism, indeed! Her sense of entitlement is to deem herself, and women generally as superior in empathy (so much for equality), while actually have no empathy whatsoever.

God also uses figurative language. True but irrelevant. Not mocking one little bit. Because I know you struggle, I felt being emphatic was necessary. At least you admit that you are struggling with figurative language. That's a big step. :D I'll try again to help you. The Buddha said that...

I don't agree with that at all. They both knew it was going against God. Eve committed the first sin. The reason it is called Adam's sin is because the first sin was the sin of omission by Adam. He saw her being tempted and did nothing.

She's in denial. I delved into this with her a while back. She is taking something from God that is unconditional, obey and submit to her man, and placing herself above God in deciding what he deemed unconditional, she will treat as conditional. The kicker is she blames men for her choices...

Rarely do I read such fact-free posts. Not a single link by a credible source to support your claims.

How long have you had TDS?