Search results

What put downs? I've not criticized you personally, just your ideas as dangerous and fully apt to leave one vulnerable to what leader of American Scottish Rite Fremasonry Albert Pike said will happen to Christianity in his 1871 letter to Illuminati leader in Europe Guissepe Mazzini.

I respect your right to an opinion, but like a mosquito at a nudist colony, I can't decide where to begin poking holes...so I'll just leave it at that.

Not open minded? Didn't I say that I studied and believed Jesuit Futurism for years?

You've tried to convince me that Daniel's image is something other than what Daniel plainly says it is: representative of nations. I've shown you from Scripture that you're wrong. You are free to believe whatever about Daniel 2, the "gap theory", the centrality of the literal nation of Israel in...

So, the ECF were wrong, the Protestant Forerunners of the Reformation were wrong, the great Protestant Reformers were wrong....but the church that preaches Salvation by Works, Purgatory, Eternal Torment, non-essentiality of the substitutionary death of Jesus, absolute necessity of Mediation of...

I'm saying no one had previously arrived at Futurist interpretations of prophecy which the Jesuits first pioneered and now you and many others adopt; a compelling truth that not only exposes the Jesuits as concluding such ideas for the sole purpose of undermining the Protestant Reformation, but...

But not so open that our brains fall out. The statue is NOT a person, it is clear by the testimony of Daniel that the statue represents NATIONS.

It's really as simple as reading the Ten Commandments and then asking "Is my church following them as written by the finger of God?" The answer is simple: the catholic church is not, as are most churches. The Bible is the test of our faith, not the word of men.

Attitudes that seem to be "assurance" in our allies we often deem "arrogance" in our opponents. I assure you that I am not your enemy - just one who desperately wants the world to know the truth about church history - because it has grave implications for the future. I've been indoctrinated with...

There is no "7 years of tribulation" in Scripture. The last week of Daniel's 70 have been fulfilled by Christ. When Christ comes "as a thief in the night", Peter says every single element on the periodic table will be incinerated...which means those of you who insist that life will continue...

Please spare me the "mean Christian" lecture. If Jesus were alive today, you'd likely accuse Him of the same. Let's stick to the Scriptures, if you don't mind. The Little Horn of chapter 7 or 8? Wrong...the Little Horn of chapter 7 arises AFTER the Greek Leopard and of chapter 8, it arises...

Here it is in plain English: God's end time church are those "which keep the commandments of God and have the testimony of Jesus Christ." The catholic church teaches commandments of men, not God. Therefore, she is an apostate church and God is calling His people out of her.

Revelation 18 is depicting a three fold NWO union of "Babylon" which is the papacy, "kings of the Earth" which are the leaders in cahoots with her, and the "merchants of the Earth" which are the economic elite. Of course this union did not exist in John's day. That's the easiest question I've...

Peter said we can't assign private interpretation to prophecy...there is only one correct interpretation - Protestant Historicism. You silly Jesuit Futurists don't seem to care that in the mid-16th century when the Protestant Reformation was attacking the papacy with Protestant Historicism and...

Daniel never said "70 Weeks of years" - that's total bulldookey. He plainly said: "Seventy (shib'iam [H7657]) weeks (shabuwa' [H7620])..." Why do you Jesuit Futurists insist on pushing square pegs in round holes to make your ideas work? Daniel said "70 Weeks" - period - and unless you are...

I responded in #733.

LOL The Scriptures teach that Jesus fulfilled the 70th Week and I think you should accept the testimony of Scripture rather than that of the Jesuits, who teach that Antichrist is the subject of Daniel 9:26.

I have the testimony of Scripture to support that the "prince" that shall come is "Messiah the Prince" because the Messiah is referenced THREE times in verses 25 and 26, with absolutely no mention of Antichrist. I also have the testimony of ancient history which testifies that "Prince Titus"...

The fact is that there are only TWO ways of looking at "the people of the prince that shall come" to destroy Jerusalem in 70 A.D. - "Messiah the Prince", Whose people destroyed themselves through driving away God's hand of protection...or..."prince Titus" of pagan Rome, whose army destroyed...

Amen, it is the probationary period given Israel to get their act together and announce the arrival of the Messiah, but they not only failed to do so, but had Him executed. I agree they have been fulfilled as well, and each of the six objectives of verse 24 can be shown as such - "...to anoint...