Search results

I've explained my view. You have retorted "that's wrong!" You have been asked to substantiate your screeching. You have failed to do so. You now cry bitterly that I am not explaining my view. What is your problem? I've never met an honest OSASer in my life. Not once.

Again, prove I haven't understood. Demonstrate.

Well, we disagree. I believe I have shared good reasons for my reading. I can't invent new words--the words mean what the words mean. What else do you want me to do? I'm simply stating the words. You can't contort them, so you apparently just outright reject them. They say : believers, God's...

I really thought I had gotten used to it, because I've been on another discussion forum, but there came a point at which I just started putting people on "Block" or "Ignore" lists, because I am just not going to waste my time. I am there to share information with honest people, not with...

Thanks for sharing your viewpoint. I've shared why I disagree.

I'm tolerant of people holding to contrary views, but not after I've had conversations with people, shown them Scripture, or other facts, and they still (pretend I haven't answered them) refuse to recognize reality--I don't tolerate recalcitrance. If they are willing to engage in conversation...

Still, I haven't watched a presentation against KJV-Onlyism except by men of God who are fruitful and learned, and I haven't watched a presentation for KJV-Onlyism except by men who seem to be out of sorts. Maybe presentations that break with that pattern exist, but I haven't seen them.

I believe it is grievous to God to insist that something is right when it is not right (because what is "right" is what God is pleased with--so it would be wrong to say God is pleased with something God hates), so I agree that we're supposed to aim higher than using disparaging terms, so next...

Tsk, tsk, tsk.

By "facts" I referred to the actual discussions taking place (in which those comments you objected to were made).

Maybe because you haven't seen the faces he makes, or heard the tones he uses, you don't think he crazy, but you wouldn't say it's "crazy" to believe gays can't repent? 1 Corinthians 6 is explicit that gays have repented! Don't you think it's "crazy" to believe Christians can literally just go...

Well, I can agree that I should be more loving, but the facts are still the facts.

If you knew "Pastor" Steven Anderson you'd agree he is a nut. He says homosexuals can't repent and be saved! He says you can murder people and still go to heaven because "once saved always saved"!

So, you took issue with my use of English. Noted.

If you knew "Pastor" Steven Anderson you'd agree he is a nut. He says homosexuals can't repent and be saved! He says you can murder people and still go to heaven because "once saved always saved"!

What is the "this"?

Here's an error in the KJV (from the video) Acts 12:4 And when he had apprehended him, he put him in prison, and delivered him to four quaternions of soldiers to keep him; intending after Easter to bring him forth to the people. The Greek says "pascha", and is translated as "Passover" in every...

Well, let's put it this way : I wouldn't be surprised if Enoch were an ignorant hillbilly. "Birds of a feather" LOL That said, in contemporary English, "always" doesn't mean "in every case", it means "quite often"--and this is not a formal conversation, or a theological treatise, it's an...

I changed the links due to your correction. Thanks. This is one of the the new presentations.

It's not about Enoch, the point is that in all my conversations, in all the debates, in all the presentations, it's always the case that men of God who are knowledgeable and who I can respect (even if I disagree with them on some or many points) take the stance against KJV-Onlyism, but fruits...