Search results

I'm reading this post and I'm like a mosquito at a nudist colony --- wondering where to get started... "I considered the horns, and, behold, there came up among them another little horn, before whom there were three of the first horns plucked up by the roots..." Those ten horns arose out of...

I admit my comments were a bit harsh and I apologize. Yet, my premise remains. If Peter was not qualified to correctly rank Paul's writings as Scripture, then in what alternate universe would any man called by God qualify to execute offices of church leadership?

Danube, the same Peter that Jesus qualified by His Spirit to "feed the flock" as a church leader is somehow disqualified to judge whether Paul's writings are or not "Scripture"? Not only is this a massive failure on your part at Deductive Reasoning, but a glimpse into why you were banned from...

Ahhh, the old "Salvation doesn't change a thing but God's opinion of my sin to which I cling" philosophy...the foundation for OSAS, Calvinism, Universalism, etc.

By "God's Law", I mean that which Jesus Himself wrote on stone tablets, as evidenced by this verse: "Give ear, O My people, to My law: incline your ears to the words (which He spoke audibly at Sinai) of My mouth. I will open My mouth in parable..." which prophecy Matthew says was fulfilled by...

If they are good and perfect, and we are commanded to be good and perfect "even as your Father in heaven is perfect", then why condemn those who advocate obedience to God-commanded laws of behavior that reflects what is "good and perfect"?

I missed this post, so I said the same thing in post 112. That's twice the opportunity for Danube to step correct regarding Paul's bona fides.

Neither, just someone who believes that Jesus makes us righteous the moment we make Him Savior and King, but also when we surrender our will to God's will in the hour of temptation, He takes over and accomplishes for us the "works" that we are wholly incapable of performing ourselves, and then...

Post # 112 is all the proof you need, friend

Great story

What's that mean? Carrying a brother isn't burdernsome?

He said "commandments" which is plural. Even if you say, "He means the Two Great Commandments", I ask you can you love God while disregarding any of the first Four of the Ten Commandments?

You're making me blush with all these likes LOL

He doesn't "cause" us to do anything...we simply allow Him to "do of His good pleasure" in us after we respond with "not my will but Thy will" to His efforts to "will" (give us the desire) in us of His good pleasure.

Well, some people call me "Phoneyman" which I find really clever LOL Well, since the Bible warns us not to accept the Mark of the Beast, I feel it extremely important to identify the Beast, so that people will watch out for it's Mark. The Beast is the papacy, which military/intelligence arm is...

Perhaps I need to clarify that I'm not saying Jack is a Jesuit, I'm saying he preaches Jesuit Futurism. Because it's the Jesuit Order responsible for introducing the world to that doctrine.

A nice very smart lady at my church always says "Grace is pardon for sin AND power to obey" which is exactly what your quote from Strong's says, because it is Him working in us "both to will and to do of His good pleasure". Our part is to just take our hands off the wheel and let Him drive.

To God be the glory. I'm just repeating what I've heard others say and if you pass it along, then God is all the more praised :)

There's an epilogue to your story written by Jesus Himself: "If ye love Me, KEEP MY COMMANDMENTS".

I see you've gotten a head start on 2019's Academy Award for Most Asinine Post. I assure you I advocate for no such blasphemous behavior. The yoke of my Savior is easy and His burden light, but to them who do not love Him, His law is grievous (1 John 5:3), worthless (Psalms 119:127), and no...