Search results

Again angels do not reproduce. The Bible does not designate the sons of God as angels. The giants were already there and there are at least there races of giants in the Old Testament....none of them are described as being the offspring of angels. The superior DNA....LOL....of the sons of God...

You should not talk that way about the Apostle Paul. LOL None of this says that the sons of God that impregnated daughters of men were angels.. I am a son of God....you are a son of God. The phrase sons of God appears through out the New Testament referring to Christians Again if the sons of...

Scripture please.....there will be a long line of scholars that will be interested in that scripture. Never said they were angels...that was my point. I nor the Bible describe the sons of God as angels.

I am speculating here with a little bit of humor, so do not take me too seriously. Angels do not have human sperm and do not marry.....true statement. But like I have said, there is not enough information here to come to a definitive conclusion. The Bible does not say that the sons of God were...

I guess I disagree with you on this too. But I did not say that the sons of God were angels. And I did not say the giants were the product of the sons of God and daughters of men mating. Anything on this is mostly speculation because there is not enough information and not enough following...

I cannot agree with this. I don't even think it was a stretch. But I will give you this, a fellow named Augustine of Hippo was thinking along these lines. But I disagree with him too.

Ya it is called reality lady. But I can see that reality is a game for you guys... For the rest of us reality is something that is connected to truth. Do you think there were astronauts in the biblical era? How about taxi drivers? The sad thing is that you do not care enough to look it up...

I would imagine that the truth would seem pretty shocking to you.

You have not produced anything that defined the Church as existing before 312 Ad and you can not produce anything that proves it existed before 312 AD because it did not exist before 312 AD. All you have is a delusion in your mind. Some bad men! You funny! Most of these atrocities were driven...

You can say they were like a Bishop but if you say they held the title of Bishop it is incorrect and depending on your intent can be an attempt to deceive. And if you believe it you are suffering from delusion. The word implies a lot more than what was going on in early Christianity....There was...

@Illuminator said, Again, find primary source evidence of an emperor telling the Pope what to teach on matters of faith and morals, or get off your "Catholic Roman Empire Church" bandwagon. You and @BreadOfLife have the same way of looking at your religion as do many Catholics….your beliefs are...

So tell us when do you think the Roman Empire ceased to exist.

I agree that the Anglicans probably used it as a insult and for the same reason that the Protestants use it today. But I disagree that it was never used by the Roman Catholic Church. Because if you just said "I am a Catholic" then the question would always be Roman or Orthodox. The last official...

Who was invited to the Council of Nicaea? Constantine had invited all 1800 episcopus of the Christian churches (about 1000 in the east and 800 in the west), but only 250 to 320 episcopus actually participated...episcopus if they were talking Latin....basically overseer. You are not going to be...

So you think that the Church had no connection to Rome? It was definitely Roman. You guys want it both ways. You want to say that Peter had a connection to Rome but you want to distance the Catholic Church from the Roman Empire. Now you know why I have to have a sense of humor. It is all about...

I do know that and we have talked about it on this thread. And it makes some sense. The word Catholic is derived from the Greek adjective, katholikos, meaning "universal," and from the adverbial phrase, kath' holou, meaning "on the whole." The term was first used by St. Ignatius When...

We are talking about the Catholic Church.

You have no good reason. It is a form of insanity and I have explained that in detail. The desire to control other people's bodies. The desire to control people down to the most personal level. The desire to control what people believe has always been a desire, but always the folly of fools...

Again never ask a Catholics about history, or really Christianity. Because from the Catholic perspective they live a fantasy that they have a connection with God that gives them sweeping authority. As it is, it is the root of all that made the Catholic Church evil. The lust for power so...

I am not a modernist liberal. But you sound like one. The Church's teachings on marriage and sexuality? How about the scriptures. BigParma....no a fan but you sound like a antiestablishment hippie. LOL Church's authority?....the root of its downfall....the lust for authority and power. That...