Search results

Why not? This is not an academic paper AND the source is not copyrighted AND I did not quote, ‘copy and paste’ a book I read years ago.

You have bared false witness against me. Losing the argument so dramatically, you turn to Ad Homenim. I was not wrong and the SC reversing itself is common knowledge. See baby killing. This is a Christian forum. The Supreme Court is not the Supreme Being.

Yes. The present case, for instance. One hallmark of personification is capitalizing otherwise common nouns. The word ‘faith’ is lowercase, indicating it is meant literally, not figuratively - not referring to a person who goes by that name.

Neither book I referenced is copyrighted. Getting past the accusations and back to point, the right of secession was declared AND achieved when the several States seceded from the British Empire. Therefore, to deny the right of secession is to deny the moral foundation of the country, to deny...

My God! It is 100% my own writing. Not sure what it looks like but an excellently crafted piece. If someone is accusing me of plagerism, they have the burden to proof it! I do not have the burden to provide a link to prove my innocence. Regarding references, I mentioned 2 (included with post...

I did no such thing! And I resent the accusation. What post did I plagiarize? Referencing and paraphrasing Davis and Paine's work is not copy and pasting it.

Yes. Your mistake is not answering questions. Yet, you want me to answer yours. I asked a simple question. Are you aware that the Bible is highly figurative. It's a yes or no question. I know you are all excited to get to the particulars but if you cannot understand at a general level, you...

What are you talking about? I did cite the source. To my knowledge, there is no "link" to the Jefferson Davis book. One must read and understand it. I do. And referenced it. It's about 1800 pages long. It's so odd the dependence people have on the internet. It's like if there is not a link, the...

We are polar opposites. I don't vote either major party but make an exception in Trump's case. I've had it with the RINO's! What's worse than an enemy? A traitor. Just out of curiosity, what Trump's policies that you find objectionable that you'd rather not see be a reality? Pro America...

While I appreciate you proving TDS is real, you speak in negation. What political party are you loyal to? 100% down the line Independent?

You really need a link to this? Try reading the source materials for yourself rather than rely on Appeal to Authority. To better understand the part in red above, I invite you to read Thomas Paine’s Common Sense and especially The Rights of Man. Even you must know that the USSC reversed...

Yes, he was. It is you who do not understand the Davis case.

I already have my friend. You don't seem aware that the Bible is a highly figurative book. For instance, Jesus said he will build back the temple in 3 days, everyone knew "the temple" meant Solomon's temple. Another example is what type of bread is Jesus talking about here? Matthew 16:7-11 New...

You know, "fact checking" started as a Leftist response to effective communication of what is wrong with Leftist policies. Who fact checks the fact checkers?

I don't know but that's law fare for you. The hand of God is on Trump for the lawfare is backfiring, increasing Trump's street credit. That's why they had to drag out Obama to shame black men to not vote for him. Let me type this slowly so you might understand it. Blacks are voting for Trump...

This vid is hilarious, stating Trump has to sign required documents to ensure a peaceful transition of power. I wonder how a propagandist would word a freedom fighter refusing to abdicate his freedom to the Deep State?

Not surprising that the very general who drank the DEI Kool-Aide and should be fired for incompetence speaks out against the MAGA leader.

Just curious, do you have TDS? Does truthfulness matter to a propagandist organization?

Great men can be wrong. A major point in Jefferson Davis' masterpiece, The Rise and Fall of the Confederate Government, and why he was never brought to trial for treason is the fact that the Constitution does not prohibit secession. Indeed, the ascension of the proposal to the Creature it became...

Yea, the object of analysis is different, not the method. Other than deny it, you really didn’t address IF what you are saying is true why is their all the angst with choosing a spouse, candidate for job, elected office, judge, if their opinions are all the same?