Search results

That is not true. The sacrifice of Christ, the One Offering, is One in that the believer is eternally secure in Christ. We don't keep trying to bring another sacrifice as they did under the Law. Our One Offering is sufficient. Stranger

You stated in post #24 that (Heb. 6:1-6) pertains to eternal life. I have already shown how it does not. My question to you was what makes it pertain to eternal life? You haven't answered. If you haven't proclaimed anything, what is post #24 and 30? If you haven't proclaimed anything...

Jesus does have a beginning; His birth into this world. The union of Deity and human did not start until then. Chapter and verse of what you cite. Stranger

Of course God can do what He wants. He can create a woman from sinful parents...through a virgin birth...just like Christ was. Yet, we are not told that Mary was the product of a virgin birth. That Mary was sinless has been your argument. Concerning 'the way God wanted it' God never does...

No, Mary gave birth to the God/Man, not God. God has no beginning. The God/Man does. Stranger

Exactly. Nineveh doesn't show repentance was denied...it shows it was granted. Thus in 40 days, God did not destroy Nineveh. Thus God permitted them the repentance they manifested. Remember, it is God who says He may permit repentance or not. Not me. (Heb. 6:3-6) Stranger

You said a lot...but didn't answer the questions. Stranger

Indeed they have. Stranger

Not going into the promised land was punishment for the offence. (Num. 20:12) "And the LORD spake unto Moses and Aaron, Because ye believed me not, to sanctify men in the eyes of the children of Israel, therefore ye shall not bring this congregation into the land which I have given them." If...

Why do you say this pertains to eternal life? How does crucifying Christ again mean loss of eternal life? Stranger

Yes, as far as I can tell those are fine. Stranger

Concerning Christ being born sinless, God has given us much information of how this was accomplished. He did so because it was necessary to avoid the original sin of Adam. Had it been necessary to have Mary born sinless or without sin to accomplish this, He would have. But He didn't. And...

Believe me, that is the abbreviated version. Much more can and probably needs to be said but I wanted to be as brief as possible. FHI was correct as to the summary on the last page. But I would encourage you to read it all. I understand. I don't know what you mean by allowing to get...

I appreciate your encouraging comments. Stranger

Where did I attempt to separate Christ's two natures? Where did I say Mary simply gave birth to a nature? You say Mary gave birth to both man and God. Who is separating the two natures now? Mary gave birth to the God/Man, Jesus Christ. She did not give birth to God, as the Deity that was...

I appreciate those encouraging words sister. Stranger

How do I know Mary was not required to be sinless? Because there is nothing in Scripture to say she was. You want to say she was. But your use of 'kecharitomene' to do it is laughable. And if Mary was required to be sinless due to protecting the birth of Jesus Christ, then why isn't...

I didn't say Mary gave birth to a mere human. I said Jesus is 100% God and 100% Man. There is no heresy in what I have said. The heresy is that Mary was sinless. And it is not me that is saying that. Is it? Stranger

Didn't mean to shock you, and I do feel more explanation is needed. If you have the time, under the heading 'Bible Study' I have a thread called 'Explanation of the Warning in Heb. 6:1-8'. It will explain the questions you have asked. Stranger

That was our prayer for 8 years. Stranger