Search results

You need to read the post again

Back at cha bro

Odds are that Timothy was objecting to worshipping Pagan gods not Pagan traditions.

Like I said I understand how people can be offended by the Pagan aspects of Christianity. But I have to caution about people thinking they know what God thinks in these matters. This is one of the things that lead the Catholic Church astray. What would have happened if Emperor Constantine...

That is my point the word Bishop did not exist....they called them Episkops. Are you saying that the term Pope is not a title? Again the word Bishop is English it simply did not exist before the English language. LOL....Do you think that Ignatius spoke and wrote in English? I do not know if...

Yes I do agree with belief that Christians at the time did not agree with Christianity joining with the Roman Empire. For about 247 years Christians had lived, generation after generation, of persecution by the Roman Empire, I mean horrible things happening to Christians. So animosity towards...

The Bible does not lie read chapter 15, that is all it takes. It is a frequent ploy of Catholics to apply more modern Catholic terms and titles to the era and the people of early Christianity with the intent to try to get people to believe that the Catholic Church was established before the...

So what? There is no "Papal power" in this era. So lets go over what Irenaeus was.... Unlike many of his contemporaries, he was brought up in a Christian family rather than converting as an adult. During the persecution of Christians by Marcus Aurelius, the Roman emperor from 161 to 180...

You so funny. Yes they did. Paul's ministry was being harassed by the Judaizers-Jewish-Christians. They came to James for a ruling to call them off. I have already explained that all the Apostles were leaders.....but in 85 AD James and Paul and Peter were dead and the Temple was destroyed and...

Bingo! LOL

Don't have to give one verse it is the whole story. They came to Jerusalem to get a ruling from James. And after they had stopped speaking, James answered, Brethren, listen to me... “It is my judgment, therefore, that we should not make it difficult for the Gentiles who are turning to God. 20...

I disagree but I have a sense of humor. Why don't you go into detail about what rights or freedoms the republicans are destroying. I dare you!

No it is the whole Chapter. There is no doubt that Peter was a leader.....he was an Apostle.....all the Apostles were leaders. We are talking about the leader of the Apostles And there is no doubt that Peter was very active and mentioned often in the New Testament. But James was the leader of...

No I have been very consistent. I have said that the scriptures do not designate anyone as the leader of the Apostles. As in word for word saying James was the leader of the Apostles. It is the storyline that designates James as the leader of the Apostles. And it is the storyline that does not...

How can a party that is pushing us to communism be for freedom. Read the first post how can anyone that claims to be a Christian support them. American communist party American demon party American drug party etc

The sentence..... And James became the leader of the Apostles....does not occur.....it is all in the story line. If nothing else you lose for yourself and the Church because they see your intelligence and character in the words you use. You need to represent the Catholic Church better.

Anyone that reads acts chapter 15 can tell they traveled there to get James ruling. And he made a ruling and sends a letter and the leading men....which is not Peter to take the letter to the churches. And there is nothing like this where Peter is presiding.

These scripture follow the event where Peter recognizes exactly who Yeshua was. Matthew 16:18-19 18 And I tell you that you are Peter, and on this rock I will build my church, and the gates of Hades will not overcome it. 19 I will give you the keys of the kingdom of heaven; whatever you bind on...

Yep and I also said that no one person was directly defined as the leader of the Apostles. The storyline shows that James was the leader at the Jerusalem council. Anyone that reads that chapter knows that. It is common knowledge. Go look it up.

Nope it is the storyline. James cannot present their concerns. We are just looking at what the Bible says and it gives no indication that Peter was the leader of the Apostles. If it did we would not be having this conversation.