Search results

OMG i do not know if you are being serious and just overlooked it. Or are still trying to act like you did nto see it because you do not want to answer It. Post 142 I quoted myself again in post 186, and asked you to respond to it. Now here is the third time, PS. I have looked at every post...

I was not discussing that discussion. i was just telling you to practice what you preach. Lol I reiterate practice what you preach.. don’t tell someone else to do something, when you have not done it yourself. forgive me if you have not figured out what I was saying yet. I hope now you do.

How can you not see it that way, I have explained it in great detail twice now oh wait, you keep ignoring that post!!

Its not. Yet I have posted the same post twice now and you have yet to respond to it. Do i have to post it a third time? You have heard the old saying, three strikes your out.. do I have to go to the three, or can you humble yourself and look back?

I never said it did. When the 70th week is completed, it will be completed. And everything which Gabriel said would happen, will have happened They have not happened yet.. No they were not. Thats the problem, Your taking a prophecy given to and concerning Israel and trying to make it fit the...

Who said he was right? I did not. So i am confused as to why you are mentioning me, I am talking about the rest of your interpretation You cant say any christian should see, when you yourself have trouble seeing.. in other words.. just stick to facts no need for all the strawman

Yes, But it does not say when the messiah will be introduced. when you look at prophecy, you want a sure thing, if you can not see it literally take place word for word as it says in prophecy, it probably is the wrong interpretation. there is one prophecy in the OT that tells us when messiah...

lol, But it is that rinse who will commit the abomination which causes desolation, the same Abomination Jesus said they ill see standing in the holy place. so it CAN’T Be Jesus Unless you think Jesus will put an unclean thing in the holy place..

Nope Only in your mind. those who actually study, would never see it this way unless they were taught that way..

Nope because 1 it does not fit the timeline, and 2. The OT did not say the people would know their messiah because he was baptized by some dude in the wilderness. prophecy must fit.. we can;t make it fit our belief system, we have to make our belief system fit the word

Yep Before the people who destroyed the city. Who were the people who were of the prince who was YET to come nice try

Thats not what John said Sin and the Child of God 1 John 3: 4 Whoever commits sin also commits lawlessness, and sin is lawlessness. 5 And you know that He was manifested to take away our sins, and in Him there is no sin. 6 Whoever abides in Him does not sin. Whoever sins has neither seen Him...

See my last post. Your comment does not make sense more does it fit the passage.. Nice try

No it is not By the time of the destruction of jerusalem, Messiah came and went. It did not say the price that came, it said the prince who would come.

Why am I being dishonest? prophecy is God telling us events that will happen in the future. Jesus told them what Jesus would do. by the way, You still have not responded to my post on Daniel 9. Why is that? Because you know I put your supposed theory about no gap in doubt?

No its right out of Daniel 9 and the rest of scripture

Well then consider me for calling you out for missing something that every christian should recognize. The prince who is to come is NOT the messiah. As for Truth7T7 , I stopped paying attention to him along time ago. He has some weird beliefs..

What did i see? a changed life.. Fruit of the spirit A changed heart. A change of mind but really non of that matters, Faith is the substance of things hoped for. The evidence of things not seen. Again, Your faith is in your water baptism, in men. where is your faith in God? don;t tell me...

Perhaps. But paul did not speak in english, so he understood what the word meant, and used it the way it was supposed to be used. No. Thats two baptisms. And Peter does not agree. The gift of the spirit was ONLY given to those who repented. Those who were baptized already had the gift of the...

I agree 100% But Saul could have said no. He had the free will do so, and we would have never heard his name thats my point.