Search results

Because God told you to evangelize. Isn't that enough? Stranger

Yes the holy people who are of the synagogue of Satan will be delivered into his hands. Yet they observe the Sabbath. Lot of good it will do them. No one is changing the Sabbath. The Sabbath is the 7th day, Saturday. The first day of the week is Sunday. We worship God and Christ...

The jury is still out on that. I am being clear, so why shouldn't you understand me. You may disagree, but there is no need to say you don't understand me. No, the atonement covered all sin. It is not limited. But it is only applied to those who are of God, who are in Christ , who come by...

You're blowing smoke now. I told you before that the transgression occurs which is why the law is given. You asked for proof, I gave it. (Gal. 3:19) But that law, the Mosaic law is not what the believer is under now. As I showed in (Gal. 3:25). Thus I have not changed anything. As a...

You say you don't make up doctrine...so we will see. Indeed, concerning (Rom. 5:12) Due to Adams sin we are dead to God. Just like those from Adam to Moses. Who were not dead due to their own sins, they were dead due to Adams sin. Your interpretation of (5:13) is flawed. Men were not...

Christians are prone to be skeptical when our government becomes less and less Christian. Our government and the people of our country used to be for Christianity and Christians. Now it and they are against. Which fuels skepticism. Stranger

Of course not. I had stated the purpose of law. You asked where did I come up with that. (Gal. 3:19) is where I come up with that. Before the law comes, there is the wrong transgressions against God, which is why God gave the Law. I have not changed in any way. Because of transgressions...

I only see that I disagree with limited atonement. The others, though I may have some differences, I see no problem with them. Stranger

The word order is very important. You recognize the importance of it because you disagree with it. Thus your need to redefine 'of God'. But Jesus is clear, they do not believe because they are not of God. They do not believe because they are of their father the devil. The Pharisees...

If it is of no avail to observe the Sabbath, what you call the shadowy Sabbath, then what is the problem? Christians observe the first day of the week. If some want to call it a Christian Sabbath, so what? You already said it is of no avail to keep the shadowy Sabbath. Of course we can...

(Gal. 3:19) "Wherefore then serveth the law? It was added because of transgressions...." Stranger

I am not changing the time of the Sabbath. I said the Sabbath is the seventh day. The first day of the week is not the Sabbath. But that is the day Christians gather to worship God and Christ. Reread again what I said. You either contradict yourself or you're mistaken. You say the "Law...

The Sabbath is always the seventh day. It has never changed. We who are Christian observe Sunday, the first day of the week, as that is when Christ rose from the dead. We are under no law to do so. But we do as the early church did. It doesn't matter to me if a Christian considers...

Not interested. Stranger

It is the very nature of law to enforce that which people are prone to abuse and break. Moral laws can be enforced just as all laws can be enforced. Just because people still murder, though there are plenty of laws against it, doesn't mean you make it legal. Stranger

No, actually I am very clear in what I am communicating. I agree with Calvin in some areas, but in some I don't. As far as TULIP, I don't even recall what all each stands for. I know I disagree with limited atonement. Stranger

If you have just come to Christ as your Lord and Saviour, you now need to look for a Bible believing Church. If you have not been water baptized, then get baptized. Ask the people of your Church to pray with you concerning this problem. The Holy Spirit, will through them, encourage you...

I know I am entitled to my opinion. That is not the point. We disagree, so why is there nothing to debate. Explain (Rom. 5:13-14) to mean other than what I have said it means. Because it disproves your statements and proves that we are guilty of Adams sin. Stranger

Does this make you comfortable to label someone? Thus all you have to do is argue against 'calvinism' instead of arguing with the individual? Why not just pay attention to what I have said and comment on that? Stranger

Concerning (John 10:26), You danced all around the emphasis of the verse. They don't believe because they are not of Christ's sheep. The order is clear. I never said the Pharisees were chosen before the beginning. I said there are those who are not of God, as those that Christ was addressing...