Search results

Maybe try Vicks under your nose. All the harassment may just disappear.

Mark 12:38-40 KJV [38] And he said unto them in his doctrine, Beware of the scribes, which love to go in long clothing, and love salutations in the marketplaces, [39] And the chief seats in the synagogues, and the uppermost rooms at feasts: [40] Which devour widows' houses, and for a pretence...

No the The devourer is the religious system.

Money isn’t the answer, Changed attitudes is the answer. the man propped up at the gate which is called beautiful was placed there by someone each morning. He was there for one specific purpose in my opinion. Along comes Peter and John and for the first time in this mans life someone loves him...

Money isn’t the answer, Changed attitudes is the answer.

It’s confusing because now we all give 30% or better maybe 50% of all our living to the government, which is what the Leviticus priest hood would have represented in Old Testament times.

I believe what the problem is, is that to many believe that a brick and mortar building is Gods storehouse.

I for one am glad Jesus didn’t hold back 90%.

What you’ve said here makes absolutely no sense, in contrast to what you’ve been saying.

Kenneth Copelands superscription or image, Is not on the US dollar.

Maybe their hands were wet

Lol, tithing is contradictory.

What Abraham’s tithe was didn’t consist of any of his crops or herd. He gave ten percent of the spoils of the men he and his kind had just murdered in order to recover Lot.

Luke 3:10-11 KJV [10] And the people asked him, saying, What shall we do then? [11] He answereth and saith unto them, He that hath two coats, let him impart to him that hath none; and he that hath meat, let him do likewise. I’m no mathematical genius, but this sounds like 50% to me.

I’ve yet to find a Levite.

Jesus told his disciples not to go in the way of the Gentiles and that He’d only came to the lost of the house of Israel, I can’t understand how it is you state you can only use the gospels for doctrine.

I saw in an earlier post that you see Matthew 24 as being yet futuristic. Is this true?

Apparently you don’t realize. For some odd reason most people believe the scripture is talking about physical healing. Like blindness deafening, cancer, restoring of limbs.

Interestingly the pots that He chose to transform in, were the pots all the guests had just washed their hands in.

Not a good idea to give children all they ask for.