Search results

You can see how spiritually immature some of these pretribbers on this forum are. By giving this insane nonsense any credibility, it shows how gullible and lacking in discernment that many of them are. But, I will say this. They are proving why understanding end times doctrine correctly is...

That's what I think he meant, also, but TribSigns isn't exactly known for his reading comprehension skills. Or common sense. Why would an amil or any post-trib believe in this date-setting pre-trib rapture nonsense?

It's absolutely shameful how they twist scripture to make it say what they want it to say. Some of them also try to create a new definition for the word "after" by acting as if Daniel 9:26 says that the Messiah would be cut off at the end of the 69th week rather than after the 69th week as the...

Look at post #12 in the thread. He seemed to be disagreeing with TribSigns when TribSigns said "Nope" to this idea of someone knowing when the rapture will occur. He responded by saying "Yep" as if he disagreed, but maybe that wasn't his intention and he was actually agreeing with him.

A generation is not the same thing as the average human lifespan. You're making up a definition for the word "generation" that doesn't exist.

While you ignore that Daniel 7:13-14 and Ephesians 1:19-23 refer to the same thing. Which is Christ's ascension to God the Father and the dominion and authority He was given at that time (and, by extension, His followers as well).

I don't buy this explanation at all. It's very biased and acts as if verses 13 and 14 were really not explained at all by the angel.

Your words mean nothing. You are ignoring the context. You said it relates to Jesus delivering the kingdom to the Father when the text clearly refers to the kingdom being given to Jesus. If you want to insist on ignoring the context of the passage, that's your choice, but that's exactly what...

That's your opinion that verse 22 hasn't been fulfilled yet, not mine. As usual, you are not bothering to actually address what I said. Again, we know that the visions Daniel had are described in Daniel 7:2-14. Those visions are explained by the angel in verses 17-27. So, where within verses...

You are such a fake. You act like you want to be respectful and then you tell me I'm rejecting what God said? What nonsense. My having a different understanding of God's promises to Abraham than you do doesn't mean I'm rejecting what God said. You reject what Paul said about God's promises to...

I agree, but we've gone over this repeatedly at this point and have gotten nowhere and I don't see any signs of that changing. So, it's time to move on from this topic. I don't say that national Israel and spiritual Israel are the same. This is very clearly hopeless to have a reasonable...

The confusion comes from the fact that, in relation to salvation and God's promises, your focus is entirely on nations while mine is on individuals. I believe that all people, including all national Israelites, have the opportunity to be saved. One's nationality has nothing to do with salvation...

If you accept what is written in Matthew 25:31-46, then how about explaining how you reconcile your Premil belief with what is written there. That passage talks about two different destinies for all people when Jesus comes with His angels to judge everyone. The sheep (the righteous) inherit...

It is, but nothing is ever simple for you. You make almost everything more complicated than it is. I don't talk only of this age. Both Daniel 7:14 and Ephesians 1:19-22 talk about Jesus ruling in this age since His ascension to the Father and then continuing to reign forever. I didn't say...

God would not do anything to contradict His word. Reinstating animal sacrifices would contradict what is written in Hebrews 8-10 and other scriptures. Where does any of the text in question in Ezekiel say anything about sacrifices and sin offerings being performed "to honor God, as a yearly...

You are taking that too literally. It's talking about Him having authority over all people, which is exactly what He has right now. Paul said that He is at the right hand of the Father ". Far above all principality, and power, and might, and dominion, and every name that is named, not only in...

Yes, He did. That's debatable, but to make that passage part of the foundation of your doctrine is just silly. We should use more clear, straightforward scriptures to form the foundation of our doctrine. In my view, that prophecy was conditional and the conditions weren't met. Ezekiel 43:9...

Go upstairs and ask your parents.

You didn't address my point, as usual. Daniel 7:14 talks about dominion being given to Jesus, which undeniably occurred upon His resurrection and ascension to the right hand of God the Father, but you are trying to equate it to when He delivers the kingdom to the Father. Being given dominion and...

You come across as very ignorant. A heretic is not a true Christian. Just because we all sin doesn't make us all heretics. A heretic is someone who believes things that contradict the core beliefs of Christianity. Such as someone who denies the deity of Christ, for example.