Search results

Quite possibly. It would be easier for info control by killing millions of layers than to try and censor the global medical community. So far all those who have "come forward" are either not expert in the fields of virology or immunology or made conclusions with no clinical research, forensic...

Define specifically "extremely high numbers" please.

Yes, but to know which form of the Greek preposition to use, one must know the construct, and all them other nifty rules of grammar to determine which is best use in English.

And the LXX suffers from the same problem every translation does- some things do not carry over equally from one language to another. Especially euphemisms and anecdotal phrases and cultural idioms

YOu said a fake rapture., NOw are you back tracking? do you even know what happens at the rapture? You have yet to show one shred of biblical support for a counterfeit rapture.

Well I will tell you what jesus said: John 3:3 King James Version 3 Jesus answered and said unto him, Verily, verily, I say unto thee, Except a man be born again, he cannot see the kingdom of God. 18 He that believeth on him is not condemned: but he that believeth not is condemned already...

I am tired of your straw men you create and you rlying about me. Welcome to the world of ignore.

So according to your made up mythical "fundamental world wide accepted doctrine of corroboration", because there are not corroborated by other Scriptures, they cannot be held as truth or literal or whatever cock-a-mamey idea you will com up with. The angels telling the disciples jesus was risen...

Well as you made a failed attempt to answer, I will reply. Luther was not expoinding on some doctrine of corroboration but letting doctrines be established by Scripture and not church councils and popes. Once again you have ripped a passage out of context and meaning to seek to redefine it.

I will be in heaven. If you die in your current state- you will be in torment.

To give eternal punishment for those who rejected the death and physical resurrection of Jesus for their sin. Its original intent was for the devil and his angels, but expanded when man fell.

Well even though the LXX is correct for Heb. 10%, it mistranslated the original passage. One sh0ould not seek to make sense of a passage by looking at another language, but going back to the original and seeking how it was used by the inspired authors.

No the lake of fire is real because God said so in His Word! Whether it seems logical to a man is irrelevant.

But you are saying otherwise! You are saying He is coming by taking millions of people of the earth, in a moment, in the twinkling of an eye! But you have no shown a biblical passage supporting this very specific act.

I won't but you may

The methodology, not the medicine. He helped pioneer the mRNA vaccine, which is used for many "shots". but make no mistake , he is not an expert in the medication-just the mechanism the medication gets into the body. big difference as you should know with all your supposed expertise.

And this piece of trivia is way off the topic this was about the supposed expertise of a man in a field he was not an expert in.

Yes it is. but when people spout such foolish nonsense that antiprasitics can treat viruses etc. Maybe they need to see the fruit of their foolishness played out in the real world! I never wish evil on anyone, unless that hardship proves beneficial in the long run. It would be much nicer if...

All these are true, but you are putting the cart before the horse! Grace produces the works and fruit! And these show we have been given new life!

Until the antichrist and false prophet make the scene and the AC is resurrected after 3 1/2 years of the 70th week of Daniel- It would just be A mark and not THE mark. The bible is very clear what constitutes the mark of the beast and no one will take it ignorantly. god even sends an angel to...