Search results

The points I made in post #506, as I said. You can see the points I made by reading that post. I assume you can read? You, Douggg, don't understand anything in relation to Bible prophecy. You, Douggg, try to make up new definitions for words like "generation" and "after" to make scripture say...

LOL. As if you don't make a lot of different points in many of your posts? How about you address at least one of my points? You don't have to address them all, but you didn't even attempt to address one of them. That's not how discussions work. You think you don't have to address any of my...

How am I judging you? I'm pointing out the truth about how you are trying to change the text of Daniel 7:13 to be talking about Jesus coming FROM heaven when, in reality, it explicitly refers to Him coming TO heaven and being brought by the clouds of heaven (the angels) before the Ancient of...

Sure. Don't address my points or anything. That's just too much to expect from you. Instead of actually addressing my points, you just try to change the narrative instead. Typical. I can't take you seriously, David. You rarely directly address my points and you expect me to address all of yours...

David, you make up a lot of things in your imagination. I do not say that you personally believe that animal sacrifices will resume after Christ returns. I may have said that long ago in the past before you clarified that you don't believe that, but I have not said that about you at any time for...

How old is this "future evil human man" at this point? I see that you associate him with the beast. John said the beast "was" even before he wrote the book (Rev 17:8), so where has this "future evil human man" been hiding all these years? Well, it says he was in the bottomless pit (abyss), so...

LOL. You say you agree and then proceed to say something that you know I disagree with. Nice one. Futurists fail to recognize that Matthew 24:15-21 is a parallel passage to Luke 21:20-24, which some futurists acknowledge is related to what happened in 70 AD. The great tribulation Jesus talked...

Daniel 7:13 EXPLICITLY says that the clouds of heaven (angels) brought Him TO the Ancient of Days (God the Father), who is in heaven. You are blatantly contradicting that with your interpretation. That's clearly in relation to His ascension to heaven. In the future, He will be accompanied by the...

Revelation identifies the great city as Babylon, the mother of harlots (Rev 14:8, Rev 16:19, Rev 18:10,21). Not Jerusalem. Also, why did you say that "Jesus was crucified outside of Jerusalem", which is true (see Hebrews 13:12, John 19:20), after saying that "Jerusalem is where Jesus was...

How can you think "to make an end of sins" is fulfilled when you take everything else in the verse so literally in terms of there having to be literal everlasting righteousness brought in and a literal finishing of all transgression? With the way you understand the fulfillment of everlasting...

LOL. You're pointing out something that has nothing to do with what I believe personally, which is what I was talking about. You want to try to tell me what I believe instead of me telling you what I believe. You want to dictate what everyone believes, as if every person either fully agrees with...

You made light of it when I simply showed how I disagree with a couple of the things said about Arminianism. I didn't say those things didn't properly represent Arminianism or anything like that. I'm just saying I don't personally agree fully with the description of Arminianism that was shown on...

LOL. You are truly a comedian. No, this is the (apparently) unavoidable misrepresentation of what I believe, which you and TribulationSigns specialize in doing. It is not. You clearly have no understanding of what I believe, as you have proven many times before as well. Same old gibberish from...

@TribulationSigns Why are you foolishly applying a laughing emoji to this post? You think it's funny for me to show how foolish you are by trying to dictate what others believe, as if everyone either fully agrees with everything relating to Arminianism or to Calvinism? As if there can't be any...

LOL. You are trying to put everyone into only those two groups as if everyone either agrees completely with one or the other. I showed otherwise, which is not irrelevant. LOL. So what? You are trying to claim that everyone is either fully Calvinist or fully Arminian and I showed otherwise by...

LOL. You obviously don't know what that means. It has nothing to do with God hating Esau's soul, that's for sure. The context of that verse is in relation to the older serving the younger, which we can see in Genesis 25:23 has to do with the nations that would descend from Jacob and Esau. God...

I like to show people what kind of person they're dealing with when talking to you. When they know you believe something as ridiculous as that, they need to realize that they have to be careful about trusting anything you say. Not that literally everything you say is false, but rather everything...

I'm lying about nothing. You quoted me with something I didn't actually say. I did the same in relation to you and you can't handle it. Stop being a hypocrite. What I quoted you as saying is my understanding of what you had said, in effect, as well. But, your rules only apply to everyone else...

I disagree with at least a couple things that are said on the Arminian side in that comparison. I don't know for sure if these things truly reflect Arminianism or not, but they don't reflect what I believe personally. At the end of the first point of the "Five Points of Arminianism", it says...

And you quoted me as saying "Yada, yada. yada...". That gave me the impression that you're fine with that sort of thing. No? Did I say "Yada yada. yada..." like you quoted me as saying?