Search results

Because you are terrible at communicating. You have no interest in trying to speak in a way that people can understand what you're saying without having to guess. This is a complete waste of time. I'm done.

Disagreeing with your interpretations is not case of being dishonest. If my interpretations aren't correct, then I'm mistaken, not dishonest. Who are you to tell me if I'm trying to look at the texts honestly or not? That's not your job.

I would go with you asking God for wisdom (James 1:5-7) so that you can understand what Jesus taught. I explained to you before what Jesus meant by looking at John 11:25-26, but you twisted the text to fit your view. The context of what Jesus was saying was in relation to the bodily resurrection...

For one thing, I do NOT keep saying I don't understand your points. You're making that up. But, if I ever do not understand your point, how is that a case of avoiding your point? It's not. If I ever can't understand a point you've made, how can I address it without understanding it first? What...

What am I not being honest about? That comment is dishonest because it's false. You can disagree with me all you want, but I am not being dishonest about anything. Revisit what? I don't even know what you're talking about. You are just unable to communicate clearly and I'm done with that. If...

There is no indication that they would be fulfilled in the order listed, so this is just yet another weak argument from you. LOL. Get serious. Nowhere does it indicate that the six things were listed in order of fulfillment. That's something you made up, just like you make up many things such...

Stephen's spirit didn't leave his body before his body died. It does not say that and that makes no sense whatsoever. A person's soul and spirit leave their body after their body dies first. You should not make things up like this just because of how you interpret other scriptures.

@TribulationSigns How interesting that you find it to be funny that you make false accusations about what I believe. I guess you think that being dishonest isn't a sin. Sad.

Where did I say anything about there not being any false teaching? I'm not saying that. But, why do you act like no one has understood the NT until recently? You are being ridiculous. Some have had understanding for the past almost 2,000 years. You act like you are the first to discover the...

Your reading comprehension skills have failed you again. I was not commenting on your interpretation of the passage, I was commenting on the fact that you made a false accusation about how I interpret it despite my having told you how I interpret it many times before. One of us regularly makes...

Look at the long back and forth discussions we've had. How can I think it's anything but a lie when you say I'm avoiding your points? That's ridiculous. If you disagree with me, fine, but I am not avoiding any of your points. That's the last thing you should be accusing me of doing.

LOL. What in the world are you talking about? Do you ever know what you're talking about? I just realized this comment was based on your false assumption that I believed the 70th week ended in 70 AD. LOL. You went on and on about that last night which was a complete waste of your time. No, I...

Do you think anything in Daniel 9:24 has been fulfilled yet?

Of course you would think that since you are too prideful to admit that you have a problem with making false accusations and you need to do something about it. It's not surprising that you would act like I should think it doesn't matter. LOL. Read the passage. The context is introduced in verse...

@Davidpt Are you having trouble coming up with a response to this post? You acted so certain that my interpretation was wrong, but I showed that the context of Matthew 23:39 is that Jesus said they would not see Him again until they said blessed is He who comes in the name of the Lord, which...

He is an evil, blatant liar. I showed him how our doctrine is based on clear, straightforward scriptures and not on allegories made up in the 2nd century and he just ignored them completely. He is doing nothing but making things up. Scripture overwhelmingly supports Amillennialism, but it's no...

Your ridiculous and baseless claims only show what a LIAR you are. Thank you for exposing that to everyone, so that everyone knows not to take you seriously.

No, it isn't. It's a lie that you came up with in your imagination. Are you afraid to address the clear and straightforward scriptures I showed that support Amillennialism? Your accusation that it began in the 2nd century and is based on allegory is a LIE. YOU are a LIAR.

Sorry, but I couldn't follow your logic here. I don't find anything you're saying here to be convincing. There can be a consummation of what was prophesied to happen in Jerusalem as well as a consummation globally of what will happen when Jesus returns in the future, so I I don't buy your one...

You don't feel embarrassed because you have no shame. You don't care if you make false accusations towards others. You think you can do no wrong because you're completely delusional and lacking in self awareness. Look at all the time you wasted last night insisting that covenantee and I...