Search results

So then again on the deep ramifications of the Opening Post..... I have said several times on the forum that the Protestant reform was a good thing. Because it allowed for a branch of Christianity that placed salvation between God and men and women. Got rid of some of false doctrines and...

So then again on the deep ramifications of the Opening Post..... I have said several times on the forum that the Protestant reform was a good thing. Because it allowed for a branch of Christianity that placed salvation between God and men and women. Well then if you think the Mosaic Law was...

Probably not bad advise. But might have a sprinkling of Judaism in it. Of course you might want to include Acts 2:38.

you are correct. Still not a requirement....

See post 49 The opening post is very deep. Over all it opens the question....how should we apply the Bible to our life.....is it the theology or is it about going back to Romans times and live like they did?

Again still speaking at the level of what people would understand in that time period. Some people do not think about ramifications or principles. Is criticizing science but surrounding yourself with it, enjoying the luxuries and conveniences of it, counting on the medical to cure your ills...

As far as the topic at hand, I am not sure how that fits in. Non-denominational is fine and Jesus focused is great. An in-depth analysis of Christ can shed some light on the rest of the New Testament. What is his character? And why? Some scholars call Him the secret messiah. Why? Because when...

LOL Big belly roll laugh! Thank you for that.

LOL Country not county....it is Missouri. And nothing I posted was really about the Amish and or the Mennonites. All I was saying is that if you think science is all bunk, you need to apply that to your life....say one thing and do another? If ya going to talk the talk....walk the walk.

Good post. It is another topic....a good topic. Had an older preacher that preached at one the Bethel country churches that I go to. Good looking and well mannered and stately and a deep voice like Randy Travis and could sing and play the guitar. Because of this he was in demand for weddings and...

Yes there is a certain amount satire in what I as saying. Believing that theologically the Bible is true, is one thing..... Believing the world is flat is another.... Saying the world is flat but knowing it is not is another.... Saying things just to make yourself look good is another...

LOL

LOL does not thing but indicate that I am laughing at you.

LOL

The classifications are obviously hypothetical with a little bit of satire, because people can be somewhere in between. And although there will be some that condemn science....none are going to give up the lifestyles that science provides. And a lot of the condemnation of science is just to make...

Her doctrine is fuzzy logic.....there is no way of getting around that. Because she does not know how it developed. I tried to explain. to no avail. The Ecumenical doctrine of the Trinity does not work. And what goes on in the Gospels proves it wrong. But the Apostles seem to say something...

Although I agree that the Apostles, particularly John....designate Christ as Almighty God and even the Creator God...the Logos. But it is contrary to most of what Christ said in the Gospels....the conversations in the Gospels, and the examples that are in the Gospels....it is one of those topics...

James was Jewish and he in fact did believe in one God...and that is Yahweh. As with the other Apostles, and if you look at the designations the Apostles give them....they refer to Yahweh as God and Yeshua as Lord. But still contrary to that and what Yeshua said and all that occurred in the...

That is not how it is written...that is why I said that you had problems understanding it. Ok let me help you out with this....do I have to get on your side of the debate to make it clear... hypostatic union is a Christological term.....the phrase does not appear in the Bible, but in effect...

LOL Does it come with an expiration date? Find that scripture..... Reading comprehension is your problem....This verse is about the Jews getting angry because they felt that what He meant was that He was equal.....that was not Him saying he was equal.....that was their interpretation of what...