Search results

I explained what the verse means and you're obviously too afraid to address what I said since you didn't do so at all. Your interpretation of Romans 9:16 contradicts Romans 11:30-32, but do you care? Of course not. Because you cherry pick scripture, as I said. Calvinists are the experts on...

Good grief. Get over yourself. Comparing yourself to Paul? You know nothing compared to Paul. God has not yet judged the world. My goodness you are completely lacking in discernment. Has He judged you yet? No. I'm sure you have not yet stood before the judgment seat of Christ to give an account...

You're not answering me at all, Douggg. I'm not talking about 4 days, I'm asking in which week of years was Jesus cut off? It can't be the 69th week because He was cut off AFTER the end of the 69th week. Do you have Jesus being cut off after the 69th week ends like Daniel 9:26 says? If so, then...

Believe what or not? It's not clear what you are saying. What is "the end" that you're talking about exactly? In my view, His second coming brings an end to this temporal age and the beginning of the eternal age to come. Jesus spoke in terms of two ages and indicated that this age is temporal...

LOL. The point is that He was cut off AFTER the end of the 69th week of years. In the case of the first 69 weeks of years, do you not believe that each week of years began right after the previous week of years ended? If so, then why would that not be the case after the 69th week? Jesus was not...

Douggg, why did you not answer my questions? Were they too difficult for you? I'll try again. Did you not indicate that you believe three of the things listed in Daniel 9:24 have been fulfilled (to finish the transgression, and to make an end of sins, and to make reconciliation for iniquity)...

Did you not indicate that you believe three of the things listed in Daniel 9:24 have been fulfilled (to finish the transgression, and to make an end of sins, and to make reconciliation for iniquity)? When else do you think those things were fulfilled except during the 70th week? Also, Jesus was...

Eventually, he will probably come up with a fourth coming of Christ and a fourth resurrection of the dead because that's what people like him do. They come up with nonsense in their imaginations in their desire to be different from everyone else and try to show how special they are by being the...

It's absolutely pathetic and there's no excuse for it. I keep telling him to ask God for wisdom, like James said to do (James 1:5-7), but he obviously hasn't done it yet.

Have you no shame when you twist scripture like this? The end comes at Christ's second coming. Like Premils do, you are trying to insert an imaginary time gap between His second coming and the end. And you are adding an imaginary resurrection in verse 24 that is not mentioned there. Your...

Right. In his false understanding of Daniel 9:24, about 2,500 years have been determined so far to fulfill the 70 weeks instead of the 490 years (70 weeks) that were determined to fulfill the six things listed in that verse.

I can see that in the case of believers, Paul says we have died to sin in the present tense spiritually and, because of that, we are free to serve and glorify God in this life. Instead of willingly rebelling against God like we used to do, we now desire to serve and glorify Him. We are...

That's absolutely false. But, never mind that. Why can't you just address what I said, regardless of whether you consider your beliefs to be Calvinist beliefs or not? LOL. You're reminding me again why trying to talk to you about this subject is an utter waste of time. Yes, it is absolutely...

Thanks. Yes. Why are you adding something to the text that isn't there? It doesn't say faith comes by hearing and "hearing through the power of the Holy Spirit in them". It says faith comes by hearing and "hearing through the word of God". Paul asks regarding those Israelites who rebelled...

I'm not aware of any verse of scripture that he interprets correctly. He does say he believes in a future return of Christ, but I wonder which scripture he thinks speaks of that? Regardless, he is obviously very lacking in spiritual discernment. He has this 3 resurrections doctrine all to...

You just completely ignored everything I said. This is pointless. If you want to insist on believing false doctrine, that's your choice, but you have no excuse for believing the nonsense that you believe in. Ask God for wisdom (James 1:5-7).

Yes, it does! But, this is what I would expect someone to say who denies the God wants all people to repent (2 Peter 3:9, Acts 17:30) and to be saved (1 Timothy 2:3-6), as scripture teaches. Titus 2:11 (NIV): For the grace of God has appeared that offers salvation to all people. If you object...

Yet, you can't back up that opinion with any convincing arguments, so your opinion means nothing to me. This is what Calvinists do! They cherry pick scripture and draw conclusions from taking those cherry picked scripture out of context. Stop being foolish and start looking at ALL of scripture...

No, it is not quoting Zechariah 12:10. Do you never look at context? It seems not. The context of Zechariah 12:10 is in relation to people mourning the death of Christ. And Jesus quoted the verse in John 19:37 in direct relation to those who pierced Him, so it has nothing to do with 70 AD or the...

Yes, there is. Matthew 26:24 The Son of man goeth as it is written of him: but woe unto that man by whom the Son of man is betrayed! it had been good for that man if he had not been born. Surely, Jesus would never have said it would have been good for a saved person to never have been born...