Search results

Yes I can! God is real, the Bible is real, it occurs in history. And here we are talking about something that is historical. Finding things like the killing or innocence will be difficult....But this is not that hard to pin point. This event occurs on a High Sabbath....so Wednesday is not...

Paul was singling women out in a very Jewish manner. Women should not preach, or have authority over men, the head of the woman is the man, and they should not talk in church. Notwithstanding she shall be saved in childbearing, if they continue in faith and charity and holiness with...

And you can't read....Touché!

The word woman is not there and a lot of scriptures are about men. Need the word woman in there. Glory to God in the highest, and on earth peace, good will toward men. How many of these do you think there are.

One cancels the other out? So can you produce a scripture that specifically says women are saved any other way? Of course I will tell you that it is a very Jewish way of thinking. Childbearing in the Old Testament is how women were included in the covenant with God.... because they did not have...

Saved physically would be an idiotic position to take with this scripture. Childbearing in this era was a rather dangerous event. This scripture is mentioning moral conduct.

Do you know what the words alone and only mean?

Can you read? It says what it says....with no other deliberation.

I did not say that all people ignore the historical context.....but the words alone and only do have a meaning.

Like I said, God has taught us many things since the biblical era. Paul, said that women should not preach, or have authority over men, the head of the woman is the man, and they should not talk in church. He also said that, Notwithstanding she shall be saved in childbearing, if they continue in...

Am I to assume you know? Sola scriptura.....scripture alone Bible only---scripture only is more or less synonymous. So I am not sure what you are getting at.....personal belief?

Did I say sola scriptura?

Turn brain on! Because you are Bible only, you are likely not to know what is going on during that time period. Women were still considered property back then. Their fathers choose who they married. Christianity did not change that for another 1000 years. Polygamy was practiced for another...

Do you think that it is ok for a black person to be free? Do you believe in slavery? Bible only....can you understand the Bible with Bible only? No. Why? Because there are time period beliefs and time period cultures. And I say cultures....how many cultures can we count in the Bible? Bible only...

Too much reverence to an inanimate object. It makes no sense. Its history is well known and it is not that accurate. You picked a scripture and it was right there.....it is exactly what happened. Was it an addition to the manuscripts was it added during the translation process? Oh, I think that...

You are doing it again! The Word is not a source of ridicule for me....never implied that! Who wants the fraudulent words of men. Seek the scriptures for the Word Of God

From what I can tell from what you said is that do not trust the work of men in the past to translate accurate scriptures. And the Textus Receptus has never been known for its accuracy......more political than anything....a personal project?

Care to count the fantasies? That there is a translation of the Bible that God signed off on. There are translations much more accurate than the JKV.....but God did not sign off on any of them. The religious reverence of any object is idolatry. You believe in a Bible....try believing in Christ...

Oh! I see! A fantasy religion!

By your line of thinking....the manuscripts that the apostles actually wrote are false....it is the newer manuscripts that are the real Bible!