Search results

YOU are NOT to be TRUSTED WITH GOD'S WRITTEN WORD. You are a DECEIVER, and clearly have come here to MOCK The Word of God. So go back to your Occult friends and tell them that Jesus Christ IS... coming soon to end their matters.

You don't even know your own spirit. You were mocking The Word of God when you 'thought'... you were slandering me. Good luck with your deceptions.

Oh really... now that's trying to use a 'revolutionist' type position with suggesting those familiar with the modern Bible version hoax are going to stop all usage of later Bible versions! Quite funny!

That's funny! :jest: Just because there's footnotes in the NKJV pointing to the NU (Critical text having also been used), he thinks that means it is NOT in the actual body of the NKJV text??? What confusion!

Not a comment by a gentleman.

Tischendorf is who discovered the Codex Sinaiticus manuscript in 1850's Greece, in a monastery. He is the one who claimed its antiquity WITHOUT ANY DOCUMENTED PROOF. By un-documented means no OTHER manuscripts of that sort, nor historical quotes by the early Church fathers, etc. Same applies to...

Your argument is stupid. The Daniel 9:27, "in the midst of the week", with the "one week" being pointed to, is a CONTEXT Scripture, and is based on that "one week" representing a period of 7 years. And that Hebrew word for "midst" is translated in the majority of cases to mean in the 'middle'...

All that is man's secular philosophy. The True Church is of The Spirit, and NOT of this world. Rom 8:9 9 But ye are not in the flesh, but in the Spirit, if so be that the Spirit of God dwell in you. Now if any man have not the Spirit of Christ, he is none of His. KJV

I got a copy of the 1st edition 1611 KJV too, from Nelson Publishers in Nashville. Of course it's hard to read, its characters are in Old English. But what makes you think that I'm advocating that FIRST EDITION KJV? The KJV I use is NOT a 1st Edition in Old English, so those who TRY to argue...

You are mocking with that bottom statement, and the rest of your post. For you, since you like to mock God's Word, while you thinking you are mocking me, I suggest you do nothing, but stay deceived and prepare yourself to bow to the coming false-Messiah that those you listen to are preparing...

Not my opinion at all, but scholar's facts. So saying the matter is just my 'opinion' is a cheap cop-out excuse to NOT face the problem of corruptions by later Bible versions that rely on Wescott and Hort's corrupt 1881 new Greek New Testament translation.

But that's where you show you are confused about the authority and existence of God's written Word. God promised His Word would be kept throughout all generations. So how has that history been shown? Simple, by the use of Scripture via proof of the early Church father's quotes of Scripture, and...

Not fanaticism, but fact. You ought to try reading what Hort said in some of his own letters about his hatred of the Textus Receptus. (I presented a link in one of my posts of the published letters written by both Wescott and Hort where they convict themselves.)

Wow! You accuse me of telling a lie when you cannot even follow the simplicity in Bible Scripture! Of course the 2nd coming has not happened yet, I never said it had, nor have I ever denied Christ's future 2nd coming. YOU ARE BEARING FALSE WITNESS, so may my Heavenly Father REBUKE you, in the...

Yeah, it's quite obvious this guy here isn't interested in facts, but is only attempting to get others to steer around use of the Traditional Greek texts prior to Wescott and Hort's corrupt post-1880s Greek Critical text.

Thing is though, Lord Jesus was not only pointing to the wicked being deceived by those coming events at the end of this world. Lord Jesus forewarned about the pseudo-Christ (pseudochristos translated as "false Christs" in the KJV, when verses 23-26 is singular in context), and said that false...

No, the Hebrew for "midst" (KJV) in Daniel 9:27 means literally... 'half' or 'middle' (OT:2677). You are playing word fallacy, trying to change the Scripture by a vain attempt to re-define the meaning of a single word. And you are also wrong about the tribulation period info. God's Word...

Geographic areas of where believers on Christ Jesus live is one thing. Christ's Church which is of The Spirit is irregardless of geographic location. So it's silly to try and combine the two into one thing. That which is born of the flesh is flesh, and that which is born of The Spirit is...

All that is just opinion, and still eludes the facts. And the facts are, the new Greek text which the 19th century British scholars Wescott and Hort sneaked in 1881 which became the Critical text, a totally different Greek text than was used prior to the 1880s, changes many meanings in New...

Work of art, now that's funny, and a cave in to Liberalism. The KJV Bible most use today isn't even the 'original' 1611 1st edition that was in Old English including Old English characters. So it's ignorance by those who keep trying to claim they don't like the KJV because of Old English! They...