Search results

Irrelevant. Take responsibility for being the war monger you are. Say it loud and proud, "I reject Jesus and his teaching that Blessed are the Peacemakers." You invoked the Wiki quote!!! :mad:

Sure. Bumper sticker reads: KNOW JUSTICE. KNOW PEACE. NO JUSTICE. NO PEACE. The "war to end all wars" is not literally so. Men continue to act unjustly and reap its reward. For instance, in defense of Hitler were the terms ending the Great War just? Absolutely not! They were punitive. The USA...

I'm all in favor of justified war. Our military assets should be at the Southern border and in Israel, protecting our national interests in the Middle East. I say "should" based on moral clarify our republic used to have. See JFK's speech regarding the Cuban Missile crisis. Through the CIA...

The childish defense is the assurances were not put in writing. Steve Ciocallanti made a great video about how the West has abandoned justice. He was surprised to realize that Putin is God's agent of justice. If we are not men of our word what are we? Native Americans said the White Skins spoke...

Opinion does not trump Fact. Fact is, NATO has provoked Russia to war. Agressors are wrong. Hamas was the agressor Oct 7 in launching 5,000 missiles. I pray God's justice does not allow agressor's to benefit from their agression. The USA has become the very thing it was created to oppose...

Although this is the common understanding, I reject it as false. Some deny the claim that all roads lead to God given John 14:6. I clarify that all roads lead to Jesus as God gave him all authority in heaven and Earth. Now, here is where logic falls most in Christendom. If I say, "If you give...

I look forward to Mary quite contrary and contrite now recognizing the need for justification for peace.

The Matrix. You are relying on Big Tech for truth. :contemplate:

Yes, I have repeatedly explained the provocation and said a LOT more than what is enough, Nazis at the border. This is why I flipped the script. Instead of trying to get me to justify war, you try justifying peace! Its so odd that 400,000 dead Ukranians is insufficient carnage to begin peace...

Great question. What's worse than this level of depravity is not recognizing it. Woe to those who call evil good and good evil, who put darkness for light and light for darkness, who put bitter for sweet and sweet for bitter! Isaiah 5:20

You've learned nothing from the 20th century blood baths! "Who fired first" becomes irrelevant with the speed and power of modern weapons. There mere amassing of missiles in Cuba constituted a clear and present danger to the US 6 decades ago. Same with Ukraine and Russia.

This has already been answered - repeatedly. Fact is, Ukraine provoked Russia to war. Now 400,000 Ukranians are dead. The only reason the bloodshed continues is the war mongering NATO keeps sending armaments to the region.

It's not that I don't remember. I reject that classification. Remember, a rock has no intent but is not evil. To say we are talking about evil itself, compared to how to commit it or become it is to split theory from practice. Obviously, the OP is wrong. Evil is the opposite of good. Therefore...

I like this sentiment but find it untrue in that evil is not nil but an intent. A rock lacks good intent but is not evil. Evil is not the absence of intent. Evil is the intent to act against God's will. Although one can get an "A" even getting one wrong out of ten, Acting 9 of 9 milllion ways...

I cannot believe you are asking - and answering this question - repeatedly. This is because it is a matter of look up reference, not a substantive topic of discussion. Any good translation tells you this. Not sure why you are distracting the conversation with this but I refer you to APAK's answer.

Indeed, the more ambiguous the verse, the more they doctrinally invest in it. A verse says, O God and read into it what they want AS IF they don't know it is an abbreviation for "OF" God.

I believe your question was directed to @Peterlag, not me. If you want my answer, check out post #470.

LOL? There's that mocking again. Russia is reacting to provocation.

Evidently not. Being a peace maker is an opportunity for NATO. Self defense is the burden Russia has in the face of NATO agression and expansion. Hence, all the military hardware shipped to Russia's border in the war. I do not think it is right to provoke conflict. Every post you make shows you...

Yes. Only NATO now plays the role of Germany then. Sure, the specifics are different but expansion/agression is the same.