Search results

Firstly, you need to learn how to properly quote someone. How you quoted me does not show anything about the topic I was discussing. My subject, the part of what I wrote that you failed... to quote, is about how many don't fully understand about the resurrection, and especially about the...

The idea Paul is covering in 2 Cor.5:1-5 is about our flesh body vs. our heavenly body. If our flesh body were suddenly destroyed, we still have a body from God not made with hands. That means non-flesh. Now since one is supposed... to understand 1 Cor.15 before they got to this point, Paul is...

Oh, you went all over the world with trying to use unrelated Bible Scripture which leaves the context of the Bible chapters where those verses appear, and you did that in attempting to formulate a doctrine that isn't even written... anywhere in God's Word! By that you are teaching 'your own'...

The reality is that they asked if Jesus was the Son of God, and Jesus affirmed that point. That Jesus is The Son of God for the purpose of His death and resurrection of His flesh is an obvious point The Scriptures make, especially in the Book of Hebrews. But at the same time, the Scriptures...

The Isaiah 25:7-8 verses are specifically about the 'change' at the 'twinkling of an eye' that Paul was pointing to that will happen on the "last trump", which is the 7th Trumpet of Rev.11. That is the "day of the Lord" and is when Jesus comes to gather His faithful Church. For those of the...

No, that is not just an opinion. It is what the simplicity of the Scripture is revealing, called reading comprehension.

I can't either, which is not what I have showed. But nice try in your attempt to discredit how I revealed Isaiah 25 relates to what Paul quoted in 1 Cor.15 about death swallowed up in victory. I think you well understood what I showed, it's just that conflicting doctrines from men you have are...

But I do understand God's Word, because one must have ears to 'hear' firstly. And secondly one must be able to stick to the subject. The subject of this thread is about the 2 Peter 3:10 event of man's works burned off this earth on the "day of the Lord", which is the day of Jesus' future coming...

No, the Joel 2 prophecy is pointing to events that happen BEFORE the "day of the Lord". Joel 2:31 31 The sun shall be turned into darkness, and the moon into blood, before the great and the terrible day of the LORD come. KJV Can you not understand English? Is English not your main language? I...

I gave the actual 'context'. That's what breaking the phrases down does. And that phrase, "the hour is coming, and now is" of John 5:25 is NOT about His future coming at the end of this world. So you just lost... the context, and reveal you don't know what it is at all.

I'm not the one making assumptions. I mentioned facts, and I get tired of hearing folks lie to themselves about those facts just so they can keep their comfy doctrines from men.

That 'spiritualizing' of Scripture will be condemned. Doing that shows error against God's Word and confusion away from His Truth.

Yeah, I know you're on man's pre-trib theory. What you have likely been taught to watch is not the same things I'm talking about. Anyone can look at the world and see how it's been going to waste like garbage in a hand basket. Jesus gave many more SIGNS than that for us to 'watch'. And the way...

That's certainly confused... The "day of the Lord" which Apostles Paul and Peter pronounced is for the LAST DAY of this present world, NOT back in history. It is NOT associated with Pentecost, so if you're trying to quote Joel 2 that Peter mentioned in Acts 2, you might try going to Joel 2:31...

I think you are confused... John 5:28-29 28 Marvel not at this: for the hour is coming, in the which all that are in the graves shall hear his voice, 29 And shall come forth; they that have done good, unto the resurrection of life; and they that have done evil, unto the resurrection of...

I'll give an example of the false Amillennialist theories you are on, right here and now. Your above statement is suggesting that Apostle Peter's "elements" with the destruction of man's works he declared on the "day of the Lord" like it already... happened... when IT DID NOT YET! Just in case...

I showed you. The time of summer Jesus contrasts to His coming per the parable of the fig tree, as compared to when the false-Messiah comes in symbolic winter (i.e. as untimely figs). And yes, the figs certainly do... represent God's people... Jer 24:2-6 2 One basket had very good figs, even...

Yet those prophecies Jesus gave in His Olivet discourse are 'specific' for His Church, because He commanded us to be 'watching' those Signs He gave there, leading up to His future return. And that... is a completely opposite teaching to men's false pre-trib rapture theory which denies we have to...

And that is exactly why I said you are in error on your interpretation of that John 5:28-29 passage. The time of that event is on the day of Christ's future return, at the 'last day' of this world. And at that moment, it is showing ALL IN THE GRAVES HEAR HIS VOICE AND COME FORTH, to one or the...

That of course is BOGUS, simply because Bible Code theory is from MAN'S THINKING AND WAYS, AND NOT FROM GOD. When God uses numbers He shows us what they represent. The 70 symbolic weeks in Daniel 9 for one example, which He even tells us those periods of 'sevens' equal periods of seven years...