Search results

This is fake news.

lol Or watch the video. which shows a different view of what Chauvin did to find out it was NOT on his neck, it was on his shoulder blades. As he was trained to do in this situation (another fact kept out of the news and the trial)

Amen, I love the quote from the medical examiner. What does a person do when the evidence does nto support what everyone wants to believe. this is the type of incident which causes people their jobs (I am not sure I got the quote 100%)

and again, remain in darkness. I have seen the video. I am dumbfounded by what i saw..

You could do this. And be at a loss. Because you have helped cover up a fast truth which has 4 innocent men in jail for something they did not do,

according to the origional autopsy report. this is not true. George floyd died of fentynal overdone.. he would have died unless he got narcan, and even then it is not sure.. He never told the arresting officer he was high like he did the year before.. There was no injury to his neck..

If the catholic church was founded by Christ. It could properly interpret his word. Its people could interpret its word. You claimed I took John 6 out of context. Yet you can not even show me how..

The gospel according to John.. Quite clear.. John 1 What we do What you will receive Vs 12 Receive him Become Child of God Vs 12 Believe Become Child of God John 3 As Israel looked to the serpent, Look to the cross Never perish As Israel looked to the serpent, Look to...

All he has to do is show me where I took it out of Context.. Have not seen it yet..

One one passage says one thing.. And another person has to go to another passage to make the origional passage say what that person wants it to say. But it does nto actually say this, that would be a clue..

You have yet to show me how John 6 is not? don’t work for food which perishes, but food which endures to eternal life what so hard about this sentence?

Many parts of scripture are self relevant, I think I have shown by the john road that these are Stan d along passages. when you try to use other passages to support a view, yet those passages, like here, contradict each other, as i have shown, you have an issue,

So you tell me i take it put of context. but can not tell me where or why? and I am supposed to drop everything and say your right?

Nope. Actually a lot of catholic doctrine rejects the literal interpretation of the word. Only when it suits them will they take him literally this is MY thread. and I am talking about John 6. Why are you unable to speak about john 6 (not your 5 pet verses) but the passage as a whole again...

Lol i think you all are unable to look at the chart and tell me where i am wrong. i am not sure if it is because you are literally unable to (although i believe this is true) or because you have so much blind faith in men who tell you what to believe that you will not even try. Because you do...

Tell me where i read it out of context? Show me the context? You can’t just say you took it out of context. Then fail to show how he did that. if anything, your focused on 5 verses out of how many?

you can;t answer it either? I love it when people attach another’s belief, yet when it comes to what is really said they run. Nice thing is you will not get any converts.. They can see what you seemingly are unwilling to see

lol No EG looks to jesus and takes him literally I notice as usual you are unable to speak of certain things which are shown to you. Why is this? Can you show me where I am wrong here? Nothing you stated in those posts refutes what I said. The true church would certainly be able to see the...

My God loved the WORLD so much he gave his son for her. So she could never perish and have eternal life.. given to as many as recieve him.

I think it is simple really, A person who has been adopted by God and saved is a new creature. A new creature does not act or live like the old creature. Ie a Dog does not return to his vomit. Its hard to fathom a person who claims to be born of God who is living in open sin and rebellion to...