Search results

Here we are....almost a week later and still no apology for lying even after you have been proven to be a liar. How sad. :( My prayers are with you....Mary

Well, it is COMMON to raise your right hand when being sworn in soooooo not sure what the big deal is about him putting his left hand on the "missal"? LBJ was sworn in on an airplane with no bible around sooooooo how can you swear in on a bible if there is none....;) Historical Mary

I haven't heard from you in awhile......You crack me up....:p

Hi JM, Thanks for joining the conversation. First I have seen you or talked to you to the best of my knowledge. I love bible study. It is written in Greek. The Greek word for brother does not only mean 'blood brother'. This "brother" could be a cousin or son of Joseph. Other Scripture...

No, it does not read like they were. You are wrong..... It says exactly what it means: Isn't his (Jesus) mother's name Mary, and aren't his brothers (adelphoi) James, Joseph, Simon and Judas? Jesus and only Jesus is named as the son of Mary....no one else....the other four names can be...

Thanks marks.......Hope you had a great mothers day weekend. Scripture calls Jesus and ONLY Jesus the son of Mary. Catholics have believed that, taught that and for 2,000 years stood up to heretical teachings that say otherwise. If you can show me in Scripture where ANYONE else is named as...

It started 500 years ago during the revolution when the seeds of confusion were planted into the Christian Churches by men who couldn't even agree with each other but they all just knew they were right because the Holy Spirit told them they were right.....It will never stop now....:(

Hey Marks, The James theory was debunked by my use of Scripture in my post #73 and BOL's post......We should move on. The plain reading of the text DOES NOT call the children of Mary sooooooo stop pretending it does. You are not plainly reading text when you add to it. ;) Thank you....Mary...

That makes no sense....

If quoting scripture makes we a winner, then so be it. I don't argue. I state facts by quoting Scripture. I believe in the "simple words of Scripture". Scripture says that Jesus was the son of Mary. It does not say anyone else was the son of Mary. It's not a circular argument....It's just...

Very impressive marks. I LOVE the way you made your point....:) I will TRULY use Occam's Razor: The simple solution to the question "Did Mary have other children" comes from these two passages: Is not this (Jesus) the carpenter, the son of Mary and brother of James and Joses and Judas and...

Not a misdirection. Scripture is silent on Mary having any other children than Jesus therefor "silence of Scripture" is valid in our discussion. Mary

PICJAG??? Curious Mary

Yup, it does name Jesus's adelphos. It DOES NOT name Mary's children EXCEPT JESUS. What does adelphos mean? a brother, whether born of the same two parents or only of the same father or mother having the same national ancestor, belonging to the same people, or countryman any fellow or man...

No, it does not change a single word. Since scripture is silent on who wrote them and you think silence in Scripture is not evidence you should never call the book of Mark or Matthew the book of Mark or Matthew.

Right....so since it is silent we take into context what is said....and Scripture ONLY says that Jesus was a child of Mary....not one other person is listed as a child of Mary. +1 Mary :) Zero for marks :(

There is nothing more to discuss.....Scripture NEVER names anyone but Jesus as a child of Mary.

Not valid in your world.....Valid in the world of bible scholars.

Scripture is silent on who wrote the book of Mark and Matthew.....;)