Search results

No. but you like making accusations without showing why your accusations have any validity.

Well judging by you and SI there is big chasms in beliefs.

Well my spelling is bad. But even though My grammar can sli-- it is still better than how you view SCriptures grammar. so then if it a system, kingdom (it can't be a spirit, god never defined him/it as a spirit) and it has been around over 2,000 years, it should be a snap for you to identify...

No you do not take it literal. You have Jesus destroying all of humanity. Your error is that you forget that Jesus returns to a specific place. where the ARMIES of teh Antichrist are gatheres to battle against Jesus! That is not all of lost humanity- you are forcing that upon the verse...

I am calm. So please show those OT saints in Abrhamas bosom who were beheaded for the testimony of Jesus and did not worship teh beast, or his image or take his mark.

As soon as you identify the beast, his mark and teh false prophet and those who were beheaded for the testimony of Jesus and the multiple Jesus sitting on multiple thrones according to y9oru reintperpretation. I gave you teh chapters, if you are the student you seem to be, you should be able to...

they are sinmiliar but do not match in consequences, reach and results! That is an easy one. and neither of these match the opening of teh seals nor th eevents of babvylon.

Well teh beast is called a man. YOu reinterpret him to be something other. and you reinteprret him to be here for over 2,000 years. So pray tell when did the beast get his start somewhere around 1 AD? and if he is around that long- who/what is he? I do believe that the antichrist is a...

But that makes one of you wrong. I know why premils disagree. But for you guys it is worse- you say it was spirituall y given to you by god. So one of you got a false spirit. Is your grammar that bad you cannot even know what is talked about there? It is not the antichrist but: . And then...

another time you are a liar! We exalt jesus resurrection as the most important resurrection ever to be! We just do not falsely call it the resurrection of REv. 20:6 differentr events defining different events with totally different contexts. It is you who refuse to answer the identity of...

Well I await your explanation then. also waiting for you to identify the mark and who or what is the beast! His image and when did the angel fly around warning people not to take the beasts mark!

Divine is "godness". What the Father is by nature, so isn't Jesus. Just like humanness YOu and I are different people but are equally human.

JOhn 3, Romans 10 all who believe in the physical resurrection of jesus are teh children of god.

So you believe when Jesus returns to earth to battle, He will kill everybody? MKatt. 24 shows survivors. Same with Matt. 25.. If this is resurrected people- He would have said so! You imply it is a resurrection but the language does not justify that reinterpretation. No that is actually...

Yes Satan is the god of this world. But Satan is not the man of sin, the beast, the antichrist. The bible declares him a man. You say he was or is here so who is he?

so according to yopur spiritual interpretation, the entire book of revelation up to the return of Jesus all runs at the same time? so the seals are happening the same time as the bowls as the trumpets as Babylon the Great as the seven churches etc? Please sho wfrom history these events as they...

Well please explain. How does one take this mark on their forehead or right hand. What does it mean that it is the name of a man or his numb er then? Who is this beast worshipped since at least Cain? Why does SI totally disagree with you, Which of you has the right reinteprretation?

I showed you that the word "hour" in John is hora and also means time frame. Matt 25? is WHEN Jesus RETURNS IN Rev 19 AND FIGHTS THE ARMIES OF THE ANTICHRIST. there will be saved and lost survivors of the tribulation period and the saved will enter teh millenial kingdom as described in all the...

Yes but you falsely associate Jesus being the first begotten from the dead with the very specific resurrection described in REv. 20. It refers to those who did not take the mark or worship the beasts image. context and subject of the context matters crucially. are you saying that all the dead...

More so than you think that because it is symbolic four other times must mean it is symbolic here!