Search results

I agree with you and the CC agrees with you. Nowhere in Scripture does it say that infants were baptized. Also, Nowhere in scripture does it say DON'T baptize them. So we have to look at other passages from Scripture and historical writings; what did the 1st and 2nd century Christians practice...

You don't have an established opinion on Scripture? You don't have a formally stated doctrine concerning faith or morals? You don't have a principle or position or the body of principles? That is what dogma is. I suspect you do have dogma because you have been articulating them on this forum...

Sooooo it is ok for you to spout off YOUR dogma but Catholics shouldn't spout off their dogma??? Hypocritical????

Asking you questions is a lie??? hmmmmm.....weird Ignored once again:(.....I guess some can't explain why they believe what they believe......;)

You said they were generally accepted and now you are saying there was no disagreement. Which one is it: Generally accepted OR no disagreement??? You used Irenaeus as an example and he accepted certain letters as Scripture that are not in our bible today.....sooooo you have me VERY confused. Mary

The parents goes about making an infant a disciple by baptizing them into the NT covenant. They then bring them up into the faith as they begin to understand what covenant they were BORN into. How does one DENY an infant from this covenant? Why are you adding to scripture and saying it does...

How does one disciple a illiterate person? How does one deny that an infant is not a person? How does one add to scripture words that are not there??? Why are you denying that infants should not be brought to Jesus when He said bring them to me? You do know that it is the parents...

Hurrah....we agree....the New Testament gospels were generally accepted from the time that they were written down. As I previously stated, and you seem to agree with me on, there was some disagreement on what was to be included in the NT. Either they completely agreed on what was Scripture or...

Yes, the disciples (Apostles) could have lost their salvation. For one of them it was better if he had not been born. Mary

EXACTLY.....It says NOTHING about the age of the child sooooooo why are you adding to scripture and saying it does say something about the age of the child? Are not some children infants????? YOU are preventing infants from being baptized....Not Scripture! Mary PS....who taught you your...

Hello, Catholics agree with you: "...go and make disciples of all peoples, baptizing them in the name of the Father, and the Son and the Holy Spirit." You are adding to Scripture when you say "...go and make disciples of all peoples, except infants, baptizing them in the name of the Father...

Hello, What constituted Scripture (the Bible) was not agreed upon for the first 300 years of Christianity. All the various churches disagreed on what was scripture. Some said Clement, Gospel of Thomas, Shepard of Hermes etc were Scripture and included them in their Sunday scriptural readings...

When you say "disciples" do you mean the Apostles (the 12) or His disciples (Mary Magdalene, Stephen, Timothy, Lazarus etc.)? Mary

“Now they were bringing even infants to him that he might touch them; and when the disciples saw it, they rebuked them. But Jesus called them to him, saying, ‘Let the children come to me, and do not hinder them; for to such belongs the kingdom of God’” (Luke 18:15–16). Paul notes that baptism...

Dear, dear Stranger, YOUR view of baptism is the view of Scripture???? I thought Baptism is real only if it is in accordance with God??? Which one is it??? Did God tell YOU that YOUR view is right???? What else has God told you that us Christians are doing wrong? Please share....;) Soooooo...

The FACT is there was a Church BEFORE 300AD. Doctrinally was The Church more like the Protestant churches of today or was it more like the Catholic Church of today? Patient Mary

Just cause you claim it was nonexistent that makes it true? Your claim is your conclusive proof??? o_O Fascinating.... I claim you are wrong.....Now we have conclusive proof you are wrong. Mary

Your evidence is ASTOUNDING......based on the evidence you provided I will now become a Protestant like you....o_O Thank you for your time

Hey dodgeball... It's been over a month now and I haven't gotten a response from you. You made a statement but haven't backed it up with facts. Are you going to at least TRY???? Can and will you give evidence that the Church hasn't taught the same basic core things since the beginning of...

LOL....You crack me up Stranger. You tell @historyb how a baptism is to be conducted in accordance to YOUR definition and interpretation of Scripture and state that it is not a baptism just because someone or some church says it is. Soooooo if YOU say it isn't a baptism then we should believe...