Search results

Questions on post #730 and 731 Commentary defined (Merriam Webster): an expression of opinion Mary PS....@nancy thinks I don't post in the debate forum:rolleyes:

Translation: I can't support my theory so I go on the attack.....;)

Hi Willie, I have never heard that interpetation before. Did you come up with that or did someone teach it to you? Curious to learn....Mary

IMO....You are putting to much emphasis on what you see in other peoples behavior or lack of holy behavior. In the end you will only be held accountable for what you do....not what they do OR don't do. If you are looking for the perfect Church with no "wrongdoing" or "partiality" or a "real...

Still stumped eh'?? Thats ok....I am a patient woman. I will wait for a LOGICAL answer. Patient Mary

What does all that have to do with you calling me a liar and then saying you didn't call me a liar?? Patient Mary

Hi Enoch, I take no offense to you calling my statement ABSURD since it is not my theory and it has been around for almost 2,000 years. Your theory has only been around for a few years....but it is plausible. It is only ABSURD if you haven't done your research. I will start you off with some...

Ok....thank you. Mary

Are you being serious??? Never mind....I know you are. How can you even say that they believe the same in what matters (Gospel, strick monotheism, keeping the commandments) if you don't even know WHO they are to ask them? You even admit they are PROBABLY in agreement.....but no one really...

Why do all of "his people spread out throughout the world" have different interpretations of Scripture that all of them say is the truth? Is that what Yeshua wants? Everyone to have different truths? Curious Mary

The 2nd beast does exercise all the authority of the first beast on its behalf. One of the many theories is that the chip COULD be the mark of the beast. Bible study Mary

Hi, Frustrating.....Isn't it? All humans fall short of the glory of God therefore all churches will have "wrongdoing" in it. We, as humans, will never make sense of it. If you are looking for the perfect Church with no "wrongdoing" or "partiality" you won't find it. May I suggest that instead...

You were talking about THE beast when you referred to the mark of the 2nd beast. They are not the same Sooooo if you said what you meant, what you said is wrong. The mark is from the 2nd beast not THE BEAST. None the less it is an interesting topic. Have you read what your Christian...

No, I said what I meant and I meant what I said. Most Catholic scholars is what YOU think, NOT what I mean. The hand/forehead is the 2nd beast not THE beast.

The so-called "mark of the beast" is presumed by most scholars to allude to the coins of the Roman Empire that bore the image of the emperor. Mary

LOL.....I proved you wrong about your ignorant statement and this is all you have to say. Goodness.....Somebody just can't swallow their pride and admit they were wrong. How sad for you :( Now that we have established that they did think they were guided by the Spirit even though we both agree...

QUOTE: "Not true nonsense lie;" You are CLEARLY saying what I wrote was "not true". If one is saying something that is not true it could be considered a lie HOWEVER it might just be a misstatement by that person or something said out of ignorance. HOWEVER, you then went on to add the word...

Hi Nancy, You take what no man says as complete truth until YOU hear different through my own discernment? Did you know that no prophecy of scripture is a matter of one’s own private interpretation? (2 Peter 1:20) The open-minded Bereans (who were Jews) were willing and eager to examine the...

I see your still stumped. That's ok....I'm patient. Patient Mary