Search results

Have you read his discussion with me? Good luck in trying to have a rational, adult discussion with this guy.

I would if there was one there. I've done it before. But, in this case, it doesn't apply. Yes, that is a dumb idea if that's what I actually believed. But, I don't. Nice job of not even giving me a chance to explain what I believe. I believe the church is already separated in one group and...

I have no idea of what you're talking about. Is it not true that you believe in 2 different days where believers will be glorified 1,000+ years apart? If he misrepresented your view, then explain how. I'm not okay with it if he did. But, I'm talking about you misrepresenting Amil, which is a...

I agree with what you're saying. Yes, that is all part of their judgment. But, I just disagree that Jesus was referring to the judgment in Luke 17:26-37 in terms of when people are standing before Him on His throne/judgment seat and being judged by Him. It's just a minor point of disagreement.

Looks like no Premills have any interest in addressing anything I said in the original post in this thread. I'll assume that they agree with everything I said there then. No objections from them, apparently.

Yes, that's right. I'm surprised you could read that, what with your terrible reading comprehension skills and all. LOL. I have no concerns about that at all. He will, however, have a word with you about falsely calling me a liar for merely misunderstanding one of your questions. Good for you...

You are so incredibly childish. I didn't want to talk to you at all after the way you judged me just because I misunderstood one of your questions. But, I had to correct this one thing. I don't care what else you have to say because I know most of it is false. I've addressed plenty of your...

This is all apparently just a game or a circus to you. What's absurd is your understanding of Amil. You do nothing but misrepresent it over and over again. You have no understanding of it whatsoever. What makes you think you can speak for Amils when you are told by Amils repeatedly that you...

Your lack of reading comprehension skills shines through yet again. I said you spiritualize everything you possibly can, not literally everything. Even you can occasionally discern when things should be taken in a literal, physical sense and can't possibly be understood in a spiritual sense instead.

Notice that I asked him how he explains why it would be difficult for pregnant women and nursing mothers to flee to the mountains and he only addressed his spiritual understanding of the nursing mothers while saying nothing about why it would be difficult for pregnant women to flee. And he said...

LOL. What a load of nonsense. All of the other seals (second, third, fourth, fifth, sixth and seventh) are referenced as to which seals they are, so it doesn't take much thought to understand that seal that was "one of the seals" that the Lamb opened was the first seal. Also, the fact that it...

Sure, but not to the exclusion of all other scriptures that can help shed light on the scriptures in question. Yep. Nope. You are reading something into the text that isn't there as you so often do. I can understand why you would want to just interpret this verse in isolation from other...

I like what you did there. But I don't doubt that "The Light" will find a way to argue that the many times you said it are not all the times that you have said it. Right.

No, I'm saying that about Paul and I agree with Paul. LOL. So, why do you apply the promises to Abraham and his seed to anyone but Christ and those who belong to Christ? Do you think Paul didn't know what he was talking about? Do you think maybe Paul had a better understanding of the Old...

You need to stop judging me or you will be judged with equal measure! We had been talking in terms of when things had happened and you were accusing me of interpreting the Olivet Discourse like preterists do. So, I thought the point of your question was to indicate when those things were...

He is talking about salvation, which is obviously an individual thing, so I have to disagree. Romans 11:17 And if some of the branches be broken off, and thou, being a wild olive tree, wert grafted in among them, and with them partakest of the root and fatness of the olive tree; 18 Boast not...

No, I will not. I know it's a waste of time. I already gave my understanding of this and you disagreed. I have nothing to add to what I've already said. Don't just look at 2 Corinthians 5:6-8, but also look at Philippians 1:20-24 for a better understanding of what Paul taught that happens to...

LOL. Why are you lying? Repent of your lies. We never admitted to defeat ever and we never will. Amillennialism is true. Period.

LOL. You call that addressing the OP? You're all talk. You are unable to form any coherent arguments to back up your false doctrine.

So much for us not talking about this topic anymore! Haha. But we can do so respectfully and maybe just one last time. I believe that you're missing the context. Let's take a closer look at the text. Romans 11:7 What then? Israel hath not obtained that which he seeketh for; but the election...