Search results

Procreation is a form of creating. The offspring are created beings - always.

Why is such a long explanation needed for a simple word meaning? Because what the word means goes against dogma. The truth is simple.

For the trinitarians, they glibly shift from the fact to any explanation of the fact ought to be acceptable. God’s name is YHWH and Scripture honors this divine, eternal and holy name 7,000 times over. So should we all.

The opposite of the case. It is blasphemy to say the son of X is X. The Bible repeatedly says there is ONE God. You are arguing for 2 here - unless you are parsing being called a god from the one God.

So simple, even a trinitarian can understand it. :eek:

Begotten means created (through the act of procreation). Look it up.

Jesus was adopted by God for there was a time that Jesus existed but was not God's son. 33 and God has now fulfilled it for us, their descendants, by raising Jesus. This is what the second psalm says about Jesus: ‘You are my Son. Today I have become your Father.[a]’ 34 For God had promised...

Allah Ackbar?! Sad to see terrorists practicing Islam again. :cry:

You know that homosexuality is wrong according to the Bible, right?

We are all sorry to see you go @Wynona. May God bless you and keep you.

What % of the data set needs to be from lesbians in order for it to be representative and how did you come to this determination?

So says you. On what basis do you deem it "not" representative as this implies KNOWLEDGE of what is representative? What do you propose to be a better sampling source?

You are the one that pointed out over 6,000 homosexual obits were analyzed. Not opinion. Fact.

Willful ignorance on display. Statistics is known for sampling - not measuring every possible point in the population.

Broken record. There are other researchers coming to the same conclusion. In my post 128, I extensively quoted Brian Clowes, PhD from a paper from June 9, 2020. All you got is Poisoning The Well on valid facts against evil of homosexuality.

Yes or no. The question is about a .gov website continuing to keep fraudulent research available and accessible. Does it make sense that an authoritative reference would knowingly keep invalid research in its database? Despite Tinman’s best efforts to Poison the Well, the research he...

As I said, multiple links from multiple studies, all finding the same thing; homosexual life expectancy is far less than the general population. If you love these people, you’d encourage them to stop their self-destructive behavior. If you hate them - as you do - continue to encourage their...

Not really an answer to the question. No surprise.

The link is from .gov. Are you saying the government is keeping an invalid research on their site? All you got is slander. Other researchers besides your hated Paul Cameron made this reasearch findings as well. One study was from 1994 and another from 2005 as I recall. From Brian Clowes...

Sarcasm?