Search results

I missed it somehow. I apologize. After reading it I stick by my original statement. Mary

Please enlighten me.....:rolleyes:

LOL....It looks YOU decided, not God, since YOU are the one who decided that @Carl was ...”simply mixing up what is written”!!! You accused him of using scripture OUT OF CONTEXT to find in it whatever he believes. YOU said “it doesn’t work that way”. What cracks me up about you and your theory...

OK...lots of words but nothing said o_O ONCE AGAIN what makes your revelations greater than others AND who gave you the authority to 'identify errors'? Patient Mary

The devil has been playing mind games on this website since March 15th , 2009. ;)

LOL....If that isn't the pot calling the kettle black I don't know what is. @Jay Ross is probably laughing harder than me. :rolleyes: It has been very clear in my discussion with you Scott that you do the same. Sooooo I ask you: Who decides how to put scripture "in context" so that we don't get...

He is also, just as he claimed, the bread of life (John 6:35). Bible study Mary

LOL....by your response it looks like "YOU don't have a Scriptural leg to stand on . . ." just like @BreadOfLife said! ;) I was hoping you would at least TRY....o_O

Many great men before you "have come identifying the error and offering the solution in the Spirit...". Your identification of errors are OPPOSITE of their identifications of errors. What makes your revelations sooooo much greater than theirs that we must "receive it"? By what authority do you...

Imagine that if every man and woman that engaged in an extra-marital affair their nose would turn purple. Everyone would then know they have committed a sin. I wonder if the same "hatred" would be directed at them? IMO....Probably not! Mary

Having a opposite sex attraction is not a sin. It is when one ACTS on it (the homosexual act) that makes it a sin. I don't "preach" to my single work colleagues about their "hook ups" they talk about in my presence and I don't "preach" to my married work colleagues when I believe they are...

Ummmm....Can you provide evidence that Zwingili thought that the papacy is the antichrist of prophecy? I can't find it!! Also, I am sure you have been shown and read in scripture the multitude of passages that shows that works are necessary for salvation and that man is not saved by faith...

Hi Brakelite........Soooooo based on your theory the Church is not the only one that can decide what the Truth is. Zwingili, Calvin and Luther took the 1,000 year bastardization of truth from The Church and broke it up into 3 truths? Fascinating theory. I am not sure how that works. Can you...

Please stop......you are publically embarrassing yourself. The "proof" is in your head and no one else's. Mary

Thank you CoreIssue..... At least I am able to give you the reason for my hope, faith and beliefs. I have done that based on scripture and Christian history. All you do is snipe at me......How sad for you :(. I gave you plenty of chances HOWEVER.....You have failed, ONCE AGAIN! The end....Mary

OK kiddo....that's what the Gnostics and Calvin and Luther and Joseph Smith etc. etc. thought also. You have failed, ONCE AGAIN, to name a student of an Apostle who's teachings matches with your beliefs. Does it not concern you that you can't even give a reason for your beliefs? Mary

You have failed, once again, to produce the roots of your teaching. Would you care to try again? Patient Mary

Please name a student of an Apostle and show me that their teachings matches with your beliefs. Patient Mary

So you are Catholic? ;) Who, from your Church, did the Apostles pass their teachings to? I have already shown you mine: Ignatius and Polycarp! It seems you are to embarrassed to reveal who gave you your teachings. Why are you embarrassed about it? Or do you even know from whom you obtained...

I gave you the teachings of my Church which began 1900 years ago. Those teachings mirror scripture and trace their roots to the Apostles John. You have failed, once again, to produce the roots of your teaching. Would you care to try again? Patient Mary