Search results

That's a blatant lie. All you have to offer are lies. Nice made up story there, buddy. Amill is taught in scripture, so it predates Premill which is not taught in scripture. LOL. Isn't ordained to enforce it? LOL! So, He's up in heaven with His hands tied behind His back? He is not capable of...

So, why did you say that just the armies will die before? And you think they will inherit His kingdom with mortal bodies and mortal flesh and blood which blatantly contradicts what Paul taught. 1 Corinthians 15:50 I declare to you, brothers and sisters, that flesh and blood cannot inherit...

Keep thinking that when Jesus was talking about destroying temple buildings (plural) that He was talking about the destroying of the temple building (singular) if you want. You don't seem to understand that one can believe in both. But, just continue in your ignorance if you insist. Since you...

You are so very confused. He's not a king without a kingdom.

Just once straightforwardly. This was the first time. Thank you for confirming that you are part of some cult who denies that Jesus Christ is King NOW! Who is your king? Matthew 28:18 And Jesus came and spake unto them, saying, All power is given unto me in heaven and in earth. Ephesians 1:19...

I gave plenty of rebuttal already in my previous posts. Do you want me to just repeat what I've already said? Do you somehow still not know what I believe after all this time? You should know that I don't believe 1 and 2 are different events, so that's not a valid question to ask me as if I...

Oh, I'm interested in the Truth and you have proven that I can't get it from you. LOL. Sure, just ignore that the disciples talked about the temple buildings standing at that time and how Jesus told them those buildings would be destroyed. John 2:18-21 is not in the Olivet Discourse. You are...

Yes, it definitely mentions the thousand years there, so it definitely supports the idea of a Millennium of some sort. But, after Jesus returns? No. LOL. This is one of your most ridiculous arguments. As if the number of times it is mentioned is a determining factor in whether it's a literal...

Your ramblings are so boring and put me to sleep. What does that even mean? Scripture is very clear that the new covenant was established by the blood of Christ and that also made the old covenant obsolete at the same time. Do you deny this? LOL!!!! What do you mean "for them"? No, He had the...

They are the ones who actually physically destroyed the temple and city, yes. But, that happened as punishment against the Jews who rejected Christ. So, the Jewish unbelievers destroyed the city and the sanctuary in the sense that they were the reason that the city and the sanctuary were...

What is this supposed still to come prince waiting for? Does he not know that he missed all of the action? His people had to go ahead and destroy the city and the sanctuary without him because he has decided to take his sweet time to show up. Once he shows up he will need to be informed that he...

LOL. No, I'm saying that your false understanding of those scriptures is not taught anywhere. Looks like your reading comprehension skills in terms of things people here say to you are just as lacking as your ability to understand what you read in scripture. You are completely incapable of...

You agreed with me that each individual Israelite would use free will to choose to believe, did you not? That doesn't line up with thinking that "God makes everything to happen". Why are you contradicting yourself? He works for the good to those who love Him. For some reason you didn't...

That doesn't change the point at all. He was the prince that shall come as of the time that was written, which was long before the city and sanctuary were destroyed. In no way, shape or form does it indicate that the prince would not be alive when the people of the prince that shall come were...

Like most Premills, he's all talk and no substance. All eisegesis and no exegesis.

This was a good thread until you derailed it with your foolish and completely unsupported belief of a future Millennium. This shows your complete lack of discernment. You're trying to say that a verse about the heavens and the earth being destroyed by fire is not the same event as other verses...

Absolutely. What he does here by sharing his uninformed nonsense would be like one of us going to a rocket scientist forum and pretending that we know far more than the rocket scientists who post there. Also, how can someone with his terrible reading comprehension skills be trusted? He thought...

Why can't you just answer a simple question, silly person? I asked you if you believe Christ is King now and you can't even answer a simple question with a simple answer. So, please just answer the question. Is Jesus King of His kingdom right now? Yes or no. Do you understand the difference...

How about you stop your childish babbling and address the original post like an adult?

Oh look, it's a whiny little child, one who runs away when his view is challenged, weighing in. Are you just afraid to address the points in the OP or do you know that you can't? What is the reason that you are not doing that?