Search results

  • Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.

    You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

  1. mailmandan

    Presidential Election Live Coverage 2020

    Too much fraud and law breaking during this election. More votes from dead people. They have video of observers being denied access to observe vote counting in Philadelphia and elsewhere, which is illegal. All in Democratic run cities. Such a disgrace! Partisan operation.
  2. mailmandan

    Presidential Election Live Coverage 2020

    I thought having a multitude of mail in ballots was a bad idea from the start. Leaves too much room for fraud. There were votes cast from people who were already dead. Dirty pool was expected.
  3. mailmandan

    Presidential Election Live Coverage 2020

    What's up with the riots? Biden will most likely win the election. Some people just have nothing better to do. :rolleyes: Riot declared, National Guard activated in downtown Portland; Denver police clash with protesters
  4. mailmandan

    If Baptism could save then there is no need for the shed Blood of Jesus.

    I already gave you answers numerous times yet all you want to do is argue, argue, argue. I hope and pray that something I shared with you does hit home one day. Good day sir.
  5. mailmandan

    If Baptism could save then there is no need for the shed Blood of Jesus.

    We already discussed this multiple times, but sadly the truth just continues to go right over your head. :(
  6. mailmandan

    If Baptism could save then there is no need for the shed Blood of Jesus.

    You remain deceived. It is by grace through faith, not works that God saves folks. (Ephesians 2:8,9)
  7. mailmandan

    If Baptism could save then there is no need for the shed Blood of Jesus.

    So you believe that it’s not enough to be water baptized, but the person being water baptized must actually trust in the water to save them or else they won’t be saved? Your faith is in water for salvation and is not in Christ alone. See Acts (10:43-47; 11:17,18; 15:7-9) on how to receive the...
  8. mailmandan

    Presidential Election Live Coverage 2020

    I’m with you. I’m sick of liberal Democrats!
  9. mailmandan

    Not faith alone?

    I’m glad that I did not gamble my eternity on believing a perverted water gospel. Instead, I chose to believe the gospel by trusting in the death, burial and resurrection of Christ as the ALL-sufficient means of my salvation. (1 Corinthians 15:1-4) Romans 1:16 - For I am not ashamed of the...
  10. mailmandan

    Presidential Election Live Coverage 2020

    Lawsuit filed. I knew these mail in votes would be a problem. I do find it strange that Trump was leading in multiple states when I went to bed last night and it looked like he had a pretty good chance of winning, then all the sudden today, after the mail in votes get counted, Biden slips ahead...
  11. mailmandan

    If Baptism could save then there is no need for the shed Blood of Jesus.

    So you reject Biblical hermeneutics? 2 Timothy 2:15 - Be diligent to present yourself approved to God, a worker who does not need to be ashamed, rightly dividing the word of truth. Isolating a pet verse, building doctrine on it that contradicts other passages of scripture is not properly...
  12. mailmandan

    If Baptism could save then there is no need for the shed Blood of Jesus.

    I already explained it to you multiple times. I did not come around to Acts 2:38 last. You act like a child. I interpreted (Acts 2:38; 3:19; 10:43-47; 11:17,18; 15:7-9; 16:31; 26:18) all in harmony. Deal with it.
  13. mailmandan

    If Baptism could save then there is no need for the shed Blood of Jesus.

    Well after all it’s the only verse in the entire Bible. I wish no such thing about it never being written, but I do wish people would properly harmonize Scripture with Scripture before reaching their conclusion on doctrine instead of isolating pet verses, building doctrine on them and ignoring...
  14. mailmandan

    If Baptism could save then there is no need for the shed Blood of Jesus.

    Anything to isolate your pet verse, build your own doctrine on it and ignore the rest of scripture that does not harmonize with your biased interpretation of Acts 2:38. Typical cult mentality.
  15. mailmandan

    Does ALL sins include "Past, Present and Future" sins?

    Typical strawman argument. I already thoroughly explained Acts 2:38 to you multiple times and properly harmonized Scripture with Scripture before reaching my conclusion on doctrine, but unfortunately, you are unable to see anything beyond your church of Christ (Campbellism) indoctrination. :(
  16. mailmandan

    Not faith alone?

    Before mentioning baptism in chapter 6, Paul had repeatedly emphasized that FAITH and not water baptism is the instrumental cause of salvation/justification (Romans 1:16, 3:22-30; 4:4-6, 13; 5:1). That is when the old man was put to death and united in the likeness of His death, which water...
  17. mailmandan

    If Baptism could save then there is no need for the shed Blood of Jesus.

    You did it again! You ignored my refutation. All you do is read (your pet verse) Acts 2:38, then ignore and skip the rest. Once again (and pay attention this time) in Acts 2:38, "for the remission of sins" does not refer back to both clauses, "you all repent" and "each one of you be baptized,"...
  18. mailmandan

    Does ALL sins include "Past, Present and Future" sins?

    Never skipped it from the start and after properly harmonizing scripture with scripture we see that faith in Jesus Christ "implied in genuine repentance" (rather than water baptism) brings the remission of sins and the gift of the Holy Spirit (Luke 24:47; Acts 2:38; 3:19; 5:31; 10:43-47...