Search results

Still ATTACKING the good ole' 1611 KJV Bible, I see. If it doesn't matter so much what Bible version one uses, then WHY DO YOU KEEP ATTACKING THE KJV by your snide remarks against it? Your snide remarks against the KJV shows you KNOW EXACTLY THE MATTER I'M TALKING ABOUT, but are trying to hide...

If you see no problem with TWO men like Wescott and Hort creating their OWN new Greek text, and presenting that to the 1881 committee that created the later Bible versions out it, then it shows YOU DON'T ACTUALLY CARE THAT MUCH ABOUT GOD'S HOLY WRIT.

Denying that I clearly showed how I used those door-to-door and carpetbagger terms is an act of you bearing false witness, because you well understood but are trying to hide it.

If the 1611 KJV Bible is so "out-of-date" as you say, then WHY do scholars often go further back in history to study the ancient Hebrew and Greek manuscripts? Why would Wescott and Hort work 11 years to create their new Greek text presented in 1881 to replace the Textus Receptus?

Of course it would sound like it to one who wouldn't be very serious about God's Holy Writ.

Not about YOUR Bible preference. That is a STORY YOU ARE MAKING UP, and you know it too! And doing that is what the sin of bearing false witness is about. You very well know how I applied those terms.

Yeah, you pretty much are saying his doctrines are wrong, just by bringing that matter up! And you never will counter the Psalms 37 Scripture that I quoted about the complete destruction of the wicked in final. And because you also quote Scripture about the wicked still in Hades, and confuse...

Do you hear what that person is saying??? How deluded can one be? By MY pointing out the CORRUPTIONS of the MODERN BIBLE TRANSLATIONS, particularly the New Testament translations from Wescott and Hort's new Greek text they manufactured from two manuscripts they CLAIMED were better and older...

The 1611 King James Bible is still the BEST ENGLISH BIBLE TO DATE, hands down, because it is still the MOST ACCURATE English translation to date, even with the shortcomings it has which the KJV translators warned the reader about. Saying it is "outdated and used archaic language" is OPINION...

Not pointless, I can't think of any more honest label than 'door-to-door salesmen' (or carpetbaggers) for Wescott and Hort's actions with pushing their new revised Greek text based on the Vaticanus and Alexandrinus manuscripts to the committee of 1881. So do you still claim ignorance of why I...

It does not... fit into "Eternal Damnationist Doctrine". And I don't see how one could even link the two subjects. Firstly, it sounds like you need to understand the difference between the wicked being raised to the "resurrection of damnation" at Christ's future return vs. the wicked going into...

That video attempts to leave the warnings that Christ gave for living a life of sin and the resulting award of such a life. Jesus did not hide the fact of those who will perish in the future "lake of fire". And that video's choice to mock Evangelist Christianity to try and reverse Jesus'...

Don't need to read what men's Catholic doctrines says about that, God's Word already covered it. It is called the "second death" in Revelation 20... Rev 20:14 14 And death and hell were cast into the lake of fire. This is the second death. KJV The second death IS... the destruction of one's...

Yeah, total annihilation is... Biblical. Psalms 37 9 For evildoers shall be cut off: but those that wait upon the LORD, they shall inherit the earth. 10 For yet a little while, and the wicked shall not be: yea, thou shalt diligently consider his place, and it shall not be. Ps 37:20 20 But the...

And furthermore... I am well familiar with shortcomings in the 1611 KJV translation. I NEVER said it was a perfect translation, but still the BEST ENGLISH TRANSLATION to date. Even the KJV translators themselves in their Letter To The Reader included in the 1st edition KJV Bible revealed some of...

And yet another attempt to ESCAPE... the issue of modern scholars TRYING to ATTACK the Textus Recptus and KJV Bible.

Me vicious? It's hard for me to be vicious to the mentally handicapped who cannot control the words coming out of their mouth.

Well I am not a believer in the skills of the HIGHER CRITICS. They show an AGENDA against the KJV Bible and the TEXTUS RECEPTUS Greek texts. The documented evidence, even in the personal correspondence between Wescott and Hort, reveals an INTENTIONAL ATTACK upon the Greek Textus Receptus with...

I'd be quoting probably about 1/5 of The Bible to you if I did all that. Even the Old Testament prophecy in Zechariah 9:9-10 reveals ONLY TWO comings of Christ. The greatest evidence though is with The New Testament Olivet discourse Jesus gave His Church in Matthew 24 and Mark 13, and by Apostle...

Do you OWN this Forum? Are you the head Administrator here? Did you begin this Thread? If not, then you need to step back and pay attention to the evidence against the Wescott and Hort movement which myself and @Bible Highlighter have revealed instead of making snide remarks about a post which...