Search results

Grow up. You added your own words to the holy scripture and I called you out on it. And instead of acknowledging it, you resort to childish insults. Yes, He did and they will. Scripture teaches that this earth will be renewed when Jesus comes, resulting in the new earth (2 Peter 3:10-13), and...

LOL. You tell me. Are you pretending as if you are willing to do that? Clearly, your mind is made up on this particular topic. So is mine. So what? Are we supposed to never make up our minds about anything? If I was never objective about this then I wouldn't have changed from being a Premill to...

That's a loaded question that would require a long response. There is a lot of scripture which does not allow for a future thousand year reign of Christ on the earth to occur. I interpret Revelation 20 in such a way that does not contradict those other scriptures. I am an Amillennialist. Are you...

No, the day of the Lord Jesus is an actual 24 hour day during which He will come and burn up the earth and physically destroy all of His enemies (1 Thess 5:2-3, 2 Peter 3:10-13). Once Jesus comes, no one will get a second chance at salvation as you falsely teach. This is a cult-like, Satanic...

Right. Despite the fact that there is nothing there at all which even hints at the text being anything but literal. In 2 Peter 3:6-7, Peter relates this future fiery event directly to the flood in Noah's day and indicates that this future fiery event that he describes in detail in 2 Peter...

I don't want to deal with this nastiness anymore, so I'm done with you as it relates to this topic. Saying Amil is like a cult is just utterly false and way over the line and I have better things to do than deal with unhinged nonsense like that. It's one thing to call each other's comments...

Oh boy, here we go. LOL. Another verse that I need to correct your intepretation of. This is getting tiresome. You are butchering that verse because of doctrinal bias. Let's take a closer look at it in context. Acts 13:46 Then Paul and Barnabas waxed bold, and said, It was necessary that the...

LOL. Uh huh. Of course, if you misunderstand what I said in the first place, as I believe you often do, then all this you're saying about one thing I said inevitably leading to other things that can be construed from what I said becomes a moot point. So, I can just ignore the part where you...

This is the passage I was talking about... Hebrews 10:26 If we deliberately keep on sinning after we have received the knowledge of the truth, no sacrifice for sins is left, 27 but only a fearful expectation of judgment and of raging fire that will consume the enemies of God. Do you not think...

No one has risen from the dead yet before what is described in 1 Thessalonians 4:14-17 occurs. You are the only one I've ever seen who believes that. The ones who the Lord brings with Him at that time are the souls of the dead in Christ. They then unite with their resurrected, changed bodies.

No. The 6th seal announces that the harvest and wrath of the Lamb are at hand and then it happens at the 7th seal/7th trumpet/7th vial. Shortly before that verse Paul taught that the wrath we are not appointed to happens suddenly and unexpectedly like a thief in the night on the day the Lord...

Talking to you is like talking to a brick wall. You accuse me of not answering your questions, but I did. Just not in the way you would prefer. I'm not going to waste any more time on you and your hyper-literal approach to interpreting the most highly symbolic book in the Bible. It's a minor...

Oh really? Who knew? Did you miss the point? It's usually Premills accusing Amills of spiritualizing scripture too much instead of accusing us of being too literal.

I have no idea what your point is here. Can you explain?

Okay, Dad. Why should we listen to you when you blatantly twist scripture by inserting your own words into scripture where they don't belong such as when you added 1000 years between Christ's return and the end when He hands over the kingdom to the Father?

You are apparently saying you think Jesus bodily ascended to heaven and then came back and later bodily ascended to heaven again. I completely disagree with that. What would be the point of that? What John 20:17 means is not that Mary literally couldn't touch Him. No, the reason He said that is...

No, you are embarrassing yourself with your constant lies, liar. LOL. Look at you squirming, trying to hide the fact that you have no idea of what you're talking about. If it's so clear in the OT that it talks about the promises of God being made to Abraham and his seed, Jesus Christ, and those...

You are laughing like a fool about something that I didn't even say. I did not say the verse proves Amillennialism because it disproves Premillennialism. It proves Amillennialism and disproves Premillennialism at the same time because 2 Peter 3:10-13 does not allow for any mortals to be on the...

So, you should understand that the 10 servants in the Luke 19 parable do not represent only 10 literal servants in reality any more than the ten virgins represent only ten people in reality. Of course I do. Did you somehow not know that is a typical Amill belief? Wait, what? Daniel 7:13-14 and...

You are aware that Amills agree with this, aren't you? Right. So far, your understanding of the parable matches the typical Amill understanding. Or, at least the non-partial preterist Amill understanding. Once again you are taking the parable literally by thinking it's talking about ten...