Search results

So, please help me understand what you mean by that then. Is that okay with you? Does this mean you are saying that, for example, in the parable of the ten virgins, that He was talking about ten actual people and that it is not a made up story about ten virgins that aren't actual people but...

Goodness sakes. When did I say that I didn't believe that some OT prophecies have not yet been fulfilled? Never. You make it impossible to have a good discussion because you don't pay close enough attention to what I say and you end up misrepresenting what I believe and arguing with a straw man...

You don't really agree with Paul's belief that he could lead some of those who were blinded in his time to salvation, as he wrote about in Romans 11:11-14?

Why the sad face, buddy? You don't like that I get upset when you wickedly and dishonestly try to claim that I said Jesus lied?

You are twisting the text to fit your doctrine. It does not say that He will receive us in His Father's house as if it says He will receive us in heaven. He said He will receive us to Himself and did not say He will receive us in heaven. Don't add to what He said! Where will He receive us? Not...

LOL. There is no COMMON SENSE being used when you deny what Peter so clearly said, which is that the RESURRECTION of Jesus was the way in which God RAISED UP Jesus to David's throne. Your CARNAL way of looking at things prevents you from seeing SPIRITUAL truth in scripture. You look at things...

I agree that it all refers literal truth, of course, but your first statement can be confusing without clarifying what it means. I don't advise ever making a statement like that without clarifying what it means. You are making the words "literal" and "truth" synonyms, but they're not. The blame...

Who do you think Paul was saying were enemies of the gospel exactly?

LOL. The OP doesn't address the topic of the OP? Nonsense.

Hey, bud, why don't you address the scripture that he did post instead of ignoring it and telling him to read further? It was always temporary, but not in the way you think. Are you aware that some of those who were blinded in Paul's time ended up being saved? The blindness is much more...

Uh huh. So, why did you start talking about something else instead? No one said this. How can we have a genuine discussion about this topic when you misrepresent Amillennialism like this? LOL! Yes, it does. It's a HUGE difference to say that the propehcies which specifically mention the...

Yes, he should just assume that promises God made to Abraham and his seed refer to Abraham and his physical descendants since that "would be understood by the original speaker and hearer". God forbid we accept what Paul taught about that since, in your mind, he substituted meanings to something...

I have no idea of what you're saying since you are being so vague. Can you clarify what you're saying here? Are you not allowing for the possibility of any given scripture passage to have a dual meaning or any given prophecy to have a dual fulfillment with the way you are looking at this?

I, and everyone else here, agree with that, but we apparently disagree on how people come to have faith. My point in bringing up Acts 17:30-31 was to show that there's no reason to think that 2 Peter 3:9 can't be saying that God desires for all people to repent when we know that He commands all...

Are you aware that part of Israel was blinded in Paul's day and that some of those who were blinded were later saved? Does that match your current understanding of what part of Israel being blinded means?

Right. He hasn't changed from the Bibleforums days. Notice that he made no attempt to address the points I made. He came up with this excuse that I'm being too personal when he was being personal himself. A tactic he is using to avoid the fact that he has nothing to refute what I said. It's...

I serve Jesus Christ, the great God and Savior of the world. Get off your high horse and stop the holier than thou act. You come on here trying to say that Amillenniailsm is obsolete and and an outdated fabrication and that you destroyed Amil arguments on another board and all this nonsense and...

LOL! Who is saying that it does? Not me. But, your interpretation of it causes it to contradiction itself. Also, we need to interpret Revelation 20 in such a way that does not contradict any other scripture besides Revelation 20. But, you don't do that.

I agree, but what you're saying here is a very simple concept that everyone here on this forum easily understands except for one person.

But, that doesn't mean it represents something that is not true. Or do you think that all allegories are deceitful? Hello? Wake up. this is exactly what I've been saying and you keep disagreeing with me! LOL!!! No problem except when someone says that Jesus does that same thing? Is that what...