Search results

All that is irrelevant to your disbelief that Jesus of Nazareth is The Christ. And that is... the matter, because to believe Jesus is The Christ is to believe that Jesus is God come in the flesh and that Jesus is co-equal with The Father. That is what Apostle John was teaching in 1 John 2.

Goodness no! God forbid. The Revelation 20:7-9 Scripture is for after... Christ had returned and only after a thousand years of His reign here on earth with His elect from that "camp of the saints" on earth (where Jerusalem is today). So no, the nation of Israel in that future time will be...

No one can depend on a sole Scripture to understand about The Father, and The Son, and The Holy Spirit as The One GOD. To even come just a little close to understanding it, one must 'stay' in ALL of God's Word like a workman. Sorry, but those who deny Jesus of Nazareth is God come in the flesh...

I'm not a Catholic, I'm a Protestant Christian, my ancestors from France in the 16th century left France because of Catholic persecution. I understand your argument alright. You just tried to connect the idea of the 'law' with FAITH. Sorry, but that will NEVER... work, regardless of how many...

Well, I kind of was covering that tares in the fire idea too. Lord Jesus simply did not cover the "thousand years" period of Revelation 20 in His parable of the tares of the field. Doesn't mean His future reign over the wicked for that period isn't real. John 5:28-29 28 Marvel not at this: for...

I haven't invented anything. Lord Jesus plainly REVEALED this matter even in His parable of the tares of the field in Matthew 13. I can't help it if Biblically illiterate like yourself haven't studied their Old Testament to know about the crept in unawares among Israel that were ordained to be...

We have enough single verse preachers out there already, quoting one verse and then presenting their own philosophical treatise on it, when often their presentation is totally skewed from the one verse within the Bible chapter context where it is written. Why don't those kind of preachers just...

Don't patronize, you don't know me well enough. Yeah, or I could have used this version... Dan 9:27 27 The ruler will make a treaty with the people for a period of one set of seven, but after half this time, he will put an end to the sacrifices and offerings. And as a climax to all his...

Well, yes, they are, maybe unknowingly, but they still are, WHEN... they uphold the false idea taught in a beth-aven church that we cannot sin anymore after having believed on Jesus Christ.

His Grace to us for the remission of sins is a FREE GIFT, not of works. For that reason, no one can even say that His Grace was attached to the law! You might want to open up Romans 4 and Galatians 3 by Apostle Paul and LEARN what he showed there about the Promise by Faith INDEPENDENT of the...

Here's a further example of God's laws still in operation today. One of God's laws in the Old Testament is to not eat certain foods, and we easily know why now, because they are not healthy for our body. Take shellfish for example. I love crab, lobster, and shrimp. But I know that shellfish are...

Legal justification??? God is not playing lawyer when we are justified by our Faith on Him and His Son Jesus Christ. Our relationship with Him and His Son is not like a courtroom. It is like being within a 'family'. Now if someone seeks to go outside what is good for the family, then what is...

You need to 'see' with a wide scope, about sin, and how and when it started. 1 John 3:8 8 He that committeth sin is of the devil; for the devil sinneth from the beginning. For this purpose the Son of God was manifested, that He might destroy the works of the devil. KJV Hebrews 2 gives us a bit...

No it wasn't, and your heptad scientific study is useless against the written Daniel Scripture. Like I showed from Daniel 9 before, it requires understanding BOTH Daniel 9:25 and Daniel 9:26 together, regarding the "threescore and two" weeks... Dan 9:25-26 25 Know therefore and understand...

Sin is defined by Apostle John in The New Testament as "the transgression of the law"! 1 John 3:4 4 Whosoever committeth sin transgresseth also the law: for sin is the transgression of the law. KJV Why do so many brethren try to get away from John's definition of sin there when it so...

Oh sin by flesh man is not what entered into this present world. That idea is an old Catholic myth, even though we know Adam's sin was imparted to all flesh. Still, it was not the very first... sin against God. Satan... is who committed the very first sin. And that was in the old world when he...

All one has to say is "Fulfillment of the law", to set me off on this. A phrase like that is too often used to push anarchy and claim it is being in Christ.

Then as believers on Jesus Christ, we have the 'duty' to be very careful what we say about God's law, for Satan's little workers in some pulpits today want us to think that Lord Jesus nailed all of God's laws to His cross. And if that isn't bad, their 'once saved, always saved' doctrine is even...

Oh, so there still are laws from God that exist today? Luke 22 with Jesus' command to His disciples that didn't have a sword, to go buy one, is proof that the 2nd Amendment of the Constitution of The United States about the right of the people to bear arms is very Biblical.

What do you think of the Luke 22 Scripture where Lord Jesus told His disciples that didn't have a sword, to go buy one? Are you saying they lacked Faith, and that's why they needed a sword? And no, not your FUTURE SINS have already been forgiven. That is a lie and not supported by God's Word...