Search results

I don't know how anyone can deny that the following two passages are about the same event, but most Premills do deny that and it is those Premills that I am addressing here. 1 Thessalonians 5:2 For yourselves know perfectly that the day of the Lord so cometh as a thief in the night. 3 For when...

That's not a good translation of that verse. Here's a better translation of that verse: 2 Corinthians 5:17 Therefore if any man be in Christ, he is a new creature: old things are passed away; behold, all things are become new. This is not referring to "the new creation", as in the NHNE, it is...

LOL. Blah blah blah. Are you as angry and unhinged as you come across here? If so, I hope you take blood pressure medication. Unbelievable. Of course the hunger is literal, but the eating a horse reference is not literal. Hello? No kidding. Who would say otherwise? Not me and not anyone else...

Look at 2 Peter 3:13 more carefully. It says we look for new heavens and a new earth, but according to what? His promise. What promise? This one... 2 Peter 3:3 Knowing this first, that there shall come in the last days scoffers, walking after their own lusts, 4 And saying, Where is the promise...

Wait a minute here. Hold on. You're missing a lot here. Remember, Paul also wrote about the day of the Lord coming as a thief in the night. You said yes to these questions: Do you believe that the wicked will literally experience "sudden destruction" from His appearance as the Bible says (1...

Why not? Explain how your answers to his questions support Premill. You answered yes to all of these questions. Do you believe that Christ is literally coming suddenly and unexpectedly "as a thief in the night" as the Bible says (1 Thessalonians 5:2 and 2 Peter 3:10)? Do you believe that the...

No, I couldn't be more right. The evidence is highly in my favor, not yours. Look at the posts being made here in this thread by dispensationalists. They only reference Old Testament scripture. Where is the New Testament scripture which supports their interpretations of the Old Testament...

And that is because these things are spiritually discerned and can't be understood from the natural man (human wisdom) or carnal perspective that they have (1 Corinthians 2:9-16). They are still just sipping the milk of scripture instead of eating the solid food (1 Corinthians 3:1-3).

Yes, I'm well aware of that and it makes me sick. They should know better. It's an insult to Christ's once for all sacrifice to believe that animal sacrifices, which He made obsolete with His sacrifice, would ever be reinstated. You got that right. Ain't. Ever. Gonna. Happen. Period.

Yes, it makes sense, because you're basically just saying what is taught in Hebrews 8-10.

LOL. You are the clueless one, as you prove repeatedly. LOL! Have you literally lost your mind? No, that is not literal. It it's a symbolic expression, as you said yourself, then it's symbolic and not literal! You couldn't come up with something more ridiculous if you tried. A person cannot...

The answer is obviously no. So, what is your point in asking this question? The point being made about the possibility of future animal sacrifices being reinstated is that it's not possible because animal sacrifices, which were part of the old covenant, were made obsolete long ago already...

That's a false claim. We interpret literal prophecies literally and figurative prophecies figuratively without making any assumptions about any given prophecy. Did you not read my post #1075 which was addressed to you? I guess I need to post it again. Amillennialists take many prophecies more...

LOL. Translation: You don't know how to interpret Malachi 4:1, but, despite that, you somehow know that someone's else's interpretation is not correct. It doesn't matter that you can't explain why. It just is. That's a really convincing argument. Go ahead. Discouraged by who? Not me. Go for it...

God never said that we will be taken to heaven after we meet Jesus in the air. That's what you want to believe, but scripture never says that. Show me where we are supposed to understand all of this in the context of a Jewish wedding. That is not stated anywhere. You are again just making...

Maybe you should stop making claims without looking at the text first. Do you take everything written in Revelation 19 literally, including the sword coming out of Christ's mouth? Do you take other scripture into account, such as 2 Thessalonians 1:7-10 and 2 Peter 3:10-12 which indicate that...

He's also right that you use carnal reasoning. You do what so many people here do, which is that you interpret one verse (Hebrews 12:22) in a way that contradicts other verses (Revelation 21:1, 2 Peter 3:10-13). That's unwise. You need to be able to reconcile all of these verses together without...

Nowhere does scripture say that being spiritually in the heavenly Jerusalem means you are also spiritually in the NHNE. So, you are believing something that does not come from scripture, but instead comes from your imagination. I am looking forward to the NHNE in fulfillment of the promise of...

Yes, it does. It clearly indicates that the NHNE doesn't come to be until the OHOE is passed away first. That means there is no NHNE until the OHOE is passed away. You're not even addressing what the text actually says. I highly doubt it will take God seven days to create the NHNE, but let's...

Can you please address what I said first before I address what you said here. Address what it says in Revelation 21:1 where it indicates that the NHNE does not come until the OHOE passes away first. Once you address that then I will address what you said here.