Search results

It calls them the wife of the Lamb (Rev 19:8). Who is the bride/wife of Christ except for the church? It's the souls of the dead in Christ which He will bring with Him when He comes (1 Thess 4:14). In other posts, you claim that no one has gone to heaven except Jesus and now you're...

That passage means we will be with Jesus wherever He is, which doesn't have to be in heaven. We will be with Him for eternity in the new heavens and new earth. Tell me why we will meet Jesus in the air if He's then going to take us back to heaven? It makes no sense for Him to come meet us in the...

But, not convincingly at all. Your logic is contradictory, as I've shown. Also, how can you think the NHNE is already here when you acknowledge that the OHOE is still here until the last day comes in the future? The NHNE only comes about after the OHOE passes away. And I saw a new heaven and a...

Show me the New Testament scripture which supports your understanding of these Old Testament prophecies. I don't see it. Why is it that Jesus and the NT authors, who often quoted and explained the meaning of OT prophecies, never taught what you're saying here?

Absolutely. Notice how the dispensationalists only quote from the Old Testament. They don't accept the NT explanations of the OT prophecies, so they think their interpretations of the OT prophecies are superior to the interpretations of the NT authors.

That's right. So, think about that in relation to what you're saying about the sea. Using the logic you're using about the sea, you'd have to conclude that it was a mistake for God to flood the earth in Noah's day since your logic says He would not destroy anything He created that he called good...

This is strange reasoning. Despite calling everything He created on the earth good, God destroyed the earth with a flood long ago. So, using the reasoning you're using here, you must think He shouldn't have done that. You apparently think that God can't change things from how they were in the...

Well, he did prove one thing. His ignorance.

No, he was clearly talking directly to and about you, buddy. As evidenced by the fact that he quoted you. But, I wouldn't expect you to understand something that simple.

That is not true at all. What is your excuse for your ignorance? Amillennialists take much of the word of God more literally than Premillennialists do. Tell me, do you take the following scriptures literally? Matthew 28:18 And Jesus came and spake unto them, saying, All power is given unto me...

This is rich coming from someone who denies the deity of Christ. Take your own advice. Just tell us exactly how you interpret the verse instead of just being vague like this.

Of course. I didn't say otherwise. The only point being made was that you agreed that the millennium occurs before the last day and no one claimed that you defined those terms the same way.

It's pretty obvious which one of you has put in the effort to get the facts about this topic and which one hasn't. One of you backs up his claims with quotes while citing his sources. The other one does not. It's not hard to see which is which. It's unfortunate that you have put put with that...

I have one more thought on what you said here that I didn't mention before. If you think that some people's interpretation of Matthew 24:15-21 is a result of being brainwashed by commentators and Josephus and so on then how did you come to interpret Luke 21:20-24 the way you do? I know you...

So, will you now apologize for acting like it was supposed to be obvious as to why you were accusing me of having some dispensationalistic beliefs while trying to mock me for not recognizing that when, in reality, it's not so obvious as to why you were accusing me of having some...

He's not saying that no Premils are literalists (almost all Premils are literalists, in my opinion), he's saying that they are not consistent with their literalism and he's saying that Amils are the ones who are consistent with taking scripture literally when it is meant to be taken literally...

Of course. Yeah, I gathered that. I agree that the last day "comes after the Millennial period and the destruction of Satan". When you had asked what you were agreeing with WPM about, this is it.

The feeling is mutual about how you interpret some of it. I don't know how you interpret all of it because you've never said exactly how you interpret Zechariah 14:16-21. I know you don't take it literally to be talking about literally keeping the feast of tabernacles, which would involve...

No, I do not. Did you read my post? I explained what I believe there. If you look up the term antichrist in scripture you should find that there is never any reference to an individual Antichrist. Instead, there are many antichrists and anyone who denies Christ is an antichrist (1 John 2:22)...

I'm not interested in having a big discussion that's based entirely on speculation. That's your thing. I tried to speculate on what Ezekiel 38 and 39 mean a little while back and you attacked my response as if I said what I was saying was a fact. I never like to speculate at all and that just...