Search results

Study: 1. Genesis 1:2-9, translate "without form, and void" from the Hebrew (tohu va bohu). 2. Isaiah 45:18, God said He did not create the earth 'without form' (Hebrew tohu). 3. 2 Peter 3:5-13, it's about 3 world earth ages, we are in the 2nd one. 4. Jeremiah 4:23-28 5. Romans 8:18-25...

Maybe you ought to review the definition of 'sin' per God's Word... 1 John 3:4 4 Whosoever committeth sin transgresseth also the law: for sin is the transgression of the law. KJV Now Lord Jesus did not nail all of God's laws to His cross. That is why Apostle Paul taught the following... 1...

I never said the prince and king of Tyrus (Tyre) did not exist. Thus I don't know where your mind has wandered off to.

Yeah, a true believer sees right through the doctrine of men you're pushing. It's a lie that we cannot sin anymore after having believed on Lord Jesus, and I revealed that fact from what Apostle Paul said. So one may choose to listen to Apostle Paul or not. I choose to heed what Paul said in...

God pointing to Satan by using the titles of the prince and king of Tyrus certainly IS... allegorical. The flesh prince and king of Tyrus actually existed. God in Isaiah 30:31-33 also points to Satan allegorically with "the Assyrian" also, though the king of Assyria was a real flesh king of...

You should go study up on the idea of analogy, allegory, parable, and symbology. You obviously don't understand it if you don't understand that God was using the prince and king of Tyrus as a analogy to Satan in Ezekiel 28. I'm not going to listen arguments against that, because I know those...

If that were true, that the 'sin nature' is no more after believing on Lord Jesus, then why... did Lord Jesus say to pray that part in red below?... Luke 11:1-4 11 And it came to pass, that, as He was praying in a certain place, when He ceased, one of His disciples said unto Him, "Lord, teach...

Now why would you say something like that? I never said what Satan did in coveting God's Throne was an allegory. That really happened. What I said was that the Ezekiel 28 chapter uses the prince and king of Tyrus as allegorical figures to point... to Satan, yet there's still phrases there that...

That's not correct. If a deceiver tricks you into committing a sin, you still committed a sin, and broke God's law.

No, that was not Satan's first sin. The Ezekiel 28 allegory shows you what Satan's original sin in the beginning was, and it certainly did not involve tempting Eve. And if you don't understand 'how' Satan originally sinned against God in the beginning, then you certainly won't understand about...

Then read my post #53.

Sorry, but the days of Noah was not... when Satan as that "red dragon" drew a third of the angels into rebellion with Him. It was back at the following time... the prince and king of Tyrus being symbolic in the below for Satan... Ezek 28:2-19 2 Son of man, say unto the prince of Tyrus, Thus...

So you want to know 'when'... Satan did the following? Rev 12:3-4 3 And there appeared another wonder in heaven; and behold a great red dragon, having seven heads and ten horns, and seven crowns upon his heads. 4 And his tail drew the third part of the stars of heaven, and did cast them to the...

There you go again, trying to be smart, saying it's 'my'... view. No it's not... 'my view', it's God's View within His Word of Truth. Big difference. And if others also grasp it from God's Word, that's not just some kind of pop movement, it instead means that is what God's written Word is...

I answered your question per Christian doctrine in God's Word. You cannot just say a sin is not a sin, regardless of the circumstances of the one committing it. Where the difference is, is that Christ Jesus covers sin for those who believe, but NOT for those who don't believe on Him. And even...

No, it's actually not a recap of the GT. The first 5 verses of Revelation 12 is a summary back from the time when Satan 'originally' rebelled against God in the old world, then to Israel's ordaining and the Seed of the Woman being born, and then Christ (The Child) eventually taking reign with...

Because of what Paul later said in that 2 Thessalonians 2 chapter... 2 Thess 2:8 8 And then shall that Wicked be revealed, whom the Lord shall consume with the spirit of His mouth, and shall destroy with the brightness of His coming: KJV That "man of sin" is to be destroyed with the coming of...

OK, gotcha', so all one must do is STAY A LITERAL VIRGIN, and believe on Jesus, and you'll be one of the 144,000! Sure... that's exactly how that's meant. NOT! I can see that you have a difficult time with metaphor and allegory in God's Word. What about this one by Apostle Paul... 2 Cor 11:2 2...

I'm not wrong, because I'm keeping to God's Word. The Daniel 9:27 verse reveals a final symbolic period of "one week" (or one seven). Per the prophecy, that "one week" is to equal a period of 7 years. In the MIDDLE of that "one week", that verse says that is when the abomination of desolation...

Then you haven't actually read it. From the start the subject is what in 2 Thessalonians 2? The subject Paul defines as being about the day of Christ's coming and our gathering to Him... 2 Thess 2:1 2 Now we beseech you, brethren, by the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ, and by our gathering...