Search results

Well you can be as presumptious as you want of me, but you are still batting 0 in trying to guess my motives. And I guess I will never understand you rposition, for you just posted what you believe and then not post why. That is not the way of the Lord to His followers. If you are happy with...

but the covenant God made with all the people of Israel does not even imply they get first dibs! And "multiplied Greatly, 3,000 men, 5,000 etc.etc., do not fulfill the promise: Jeremiah 31:31-34 King James Version 31 Behold, the days come, saith the Lord, that I will make a new covenant with...

And again you arrive that by reinterpreting Gods Word to make it conform to your ideas! 20 And I saw an angel come down from heaven, having the key of the bottomless pit and a great chain in his hand. 2 And he laid hold on the dragon, that old serpent, which is the Devil, and Satan, and bound...

Posting it over and over does not make it conform to your Word. It is still Gods Word versus your word.

No it does not clearly indicate. If it did as this is one sermon addressed to the same group, Peter clearly delineated the Judeans and Israelties! while there is an implication that Israel and Judah are restored, it can't be discerned in the content of the New Covenant: Jeremiah 31:31-34 King...

Wrong again for about the tenth time! You forget that in between teh first and second resurrections is a gap of 1,000 years. but you do not accept Gods Word and have substituted Gods Word for your own.

One verse shatters your hypothesis born in the RCC: Matthew 19:28 And Jesus said unto them, Verily I say unto you, That ye which have followed me, in the regeneration when the Son of man shall sit in the throne of his glory, ye also shall sit upon twelve thrones, judging the twelve tribes of...

Well as you are unwilling to try, you will never know if your opinion has any merit on this. And it appears as if your teacher/lecturers sprout you believing they have the truth. That is a two way door! Yes I believe I am right, but I have in my 47 years of walking with the Lord always been...

My bad I saw that as Pat Robertson, but yes Robinson though holding some rather bizaare doctrines does hold to biblical dispensationalism. And actually dispensationalism was reborn in the 19th century. Covenantal theology with its anti-semitic root held sway in teh church since its birth with...

Well that was my bad for not putting words I intended. I meant to write show me from Jeremiah 31:31-34 where the church is involved in teh New covenant or that Gentiles are involved. Please point out the verse! Jeremiah 31:31-34 King James Version 31 Behold, the days come, saith the Lord...

Well maybe I should attribute your slander to being a baby Christian, but to deny the blood and the indwelling Spirit is to say one is unsaved! You can't get around your ad hominem. Show the verse that defends your two accusations!

I am being honest. I hold to what is known as a literal/historical/grammatical method of understanding SCripture, yo0u hold to a more allegorical approach, at least for this section of prophecy. And you have not explained why.

Once again it is with Gods Word you disagree! It is all there in the bible. But if you do not accept teh Word of God as written, yes, you will fall for anything a manmade organization will put forth.

And their spirits and souls are in heaven, while their bodies are in the ground! As Paul worte. And you are wrong sir. those are written in th epresent tense, which means they all have eternal life NOW! Just as I do!

No you disagree with Scripture, I agree with it. so your disagreement is not with me but God Himself!

Well this is true. so we are concluded then. We will elt time show who understands the passage. Me as it is written or you as you have "interpreted it".

You are so bought into this foolishness that there is a global conspiracy to keep people away from some treatments that it has completely clouded your judgment. Listening to you and others , the entire medical industry, except those souls who agree with you, the entire media industry, except...

And your proof is? You keep calling, then use your own system to prove the other system is corrupt. You own brand of circular reasoning. Most don't villify the other side. Some do. But as you consider any research data produced evil, it won't matter! You forget that things like hcq was...

Maybe, maybe not. All depends on how you defend your position.

Well as you have shown yourself a careless reader of Gods word, I am not surprised by this answer. but you trip yourself up for you overlook one little word which proves your hypothesis wrong> that little word is "all". Maybe I missed it in the several huyndred times I read the new covenant...