Search results

Doesn’t make it illegal. We are not supporting Trump for Pope but to build the damn wall and MAGA. Nothing else matters on the political front.

Yes. Yes, I do think I have done the young man good for I have done good by him! It is ALWAYS good to be kind and sympathetic. I can be friendly to not only those who I disagree with but we are commanded to pray even for our enemies. And this young man is not our enemy! :mad: You think you are...

Wow! Sad how God words divide those who follow Christ. A lesson of math AND reading comprehension. 1 is BOTH less than 2 AND less than 3. To say AFTER 69 may also be AFTER 69 1/2. To say Jesus rose AFTER 3 days is not the same as ON the 3rd day. Having said all that, I'm not sure what such...

Perhaps. But Elijah was an OT prophet in the times of the law. We live in the age of grace. The OP predictions do me no harm but you seem to be taking it very personally.

Your mocking post approaches cruelty. Normally, I appreciate your insightful posts. Not this time.

How in the world can anyone suppose this is consistent with the 1A right to free speech?

Depends on who you ask. There is nothing wrong with making “I” statements. I love you I am glad you told me I’d like you to tell me how you feel about this and how you came to this conclusion? Have you process how you feel about this? I’d tell her gently that this is not natural and...

The difference is, Trump supporters are not out to get him no matter what. Bias is a part of the human condition. I’ve made many decisions over-coming my initial bias. The impeachment of Nixon was not totally partisan, like the J6 committee. There are plenty of RINO’s out there that I...

I noticed that. Youtube does not want "disinformation" (aka the truth) to get out on important subjects. Let's talk about our preferred pronouns and how minorities don't have the "right" decide policy as much as the majority.

Getting back to the OP, the case for Peter being the 1st Pope is specious. Ex post facto, several centuries later they deemed a sucession starting with the Apostle. Peter's credentials for being the ambassador to the Roman Gentiles cannot compare to Paul. However, the "this is the rock I build...

Welcome to my ignore list.

‘We’ in the entire context of Samuel applied only to the Jews, who will all also die.

No. I did not lie. Everyone knows you are OSAS. In your view, one can sin with impunity provided one previously claimed to believe. That is, you attribute needed actions only once in the past and not a current and ongoing state of action. Your OSAS doctrine is in direct contradiction to God’s...

It says mor than that. It states the requirements for salvation, the actions we must take, which you deny exist.

Yet, I quote Romans 10:9, which explicitly spells out the requirements of action on us and you ignore it. @Patrick1966 is right; you are going against Gods word.

That is what the verse says. On what basis do you take ‘we’ to mean humanity?

Romans is not part of Pauline Theology?

No. The ‘we’ in Samuel refers to God chosen people of Israel, not the damned.

Obviously, that’s not true since I did not start this thread. Your recent tactic is to advance the false doctrine BUT not use the name, OSAS. IF one were to categorize my doctrine in this, it’d be NOSAS. :pfite:

Yes, you do. Every thread reveals it. OSAS is your cult. I don't know what this means but Paul wrote Romans 10:9. You keep ignoring the many verses that God against your OSAS cult. Patrick quoted Matthew 25: 41-43. Your reply was non-responsive. Get passed the milk that those who believe will...