Search results

  • Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.

    You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

  1. Paul Christensen

    Why do we need priests?

    Do you know the difference between literal and symbolic? I don't think any miracle happens in the Mass. It is just that the priest and the people believe that the wafer and the wine turns into the body and blood of Jesus. It is a faith thing and not a real miracle.
  2. Paul Christensen

    Why do we need priests?

    Many are. But it is not because they are Protestants or Catholics, but they are Bible-believing Christians. By the way, this is a question I am asking everyone by way of a survey: Are you a good person?
  3. Paul Christensen

    Is this good for Christianity?

    I think that people reject the faith because they see that many professing Christians live as if they don't believe the Bible to be true. These "Christians" can be angels at church, but lying, thieving, blaspheming, fornicating adulterers at heart when they are away from the eyes of their...
  4. Paul Christensen

    Heresy within Christianity

    Half the truth? The top half or the bottom half? I guess the guy saying, "I'll be a monkey's uncle!" might be telling the truth! I told a friend once who was eating a banana, that observing him makes me more willing to believe in evolution! :-)
  5. Paul Christensen

    The Great Deception

    No. Because I can see the photos of dinosaur skeletons in the museums. So, (dig, dig), you are not going to die physically then one day? You will just die symbolically? Did you hear the one about the Christian Scientist who got sick, and his pastor told him that he was not really sick but...
  6. Paul Christensen

    Heresy within Christianity

    But the examples you showed did not show change from one species of plant to another, nor of one species of rodent to another. All you showed was mutation and adaptation within the same individual species of plant and rodent. If the evening primrose had changed into a rose, I would be more...
  7. Paul Christensen

    Heresy within Christianity

    But there is a gap in the genetic code of the chimp which makes it different enough to totally prevent it from being anything like a human being. Two prominent evolutionists state that we are related to the banana! Does that make it that we are evolved from bananas! Anyone who believes that...
  8. Paul Christensen

    Is this good for Christianity?

    Thanks for that. :-) No. I don't believe his atheistic teaching. But what was significant to me was that his comment about Christianity being dogmatic about belief in the Bible, which he accepts, and then he says that when Christians themselves compromise their belief in the literal text of...
  9. Paul Christensen

    The Great Deception

    So, you don't believe that these verses are true: "For if, by the trespass of the one man, death reigned through that one man, how much more will those who receive an abundance of grace and of the gift of righteousness reign in life through the one man, Jesus Christ!" (Romans 5:17) "For since...
  10. Paul Christensen

    Is this good for Christianity?

    Why don't you stop abusing me and just honestly answer my questions, or have a respectful discussion? If you can't, I'll just put you on ignore and that will be that!
  11. Paul Christensen

    Heresy within Christianity

    It probably was the mouse! :-) But there is no fusion, and the 5% difference might as well be 100% in terms of evolutionary change. The fact that chimps are very close genetically to humans shows in its appearance, sharing many genetic traits with humans (two eyes, two ears, two arms, two...
  12. Paul Christensen

    Heresy within Christianity

    I don't think you do, because you don't believe the three verses I quoted to you from Romans and 2 Corinthians.
  13. Paul Christensen

    Heresy within Christianity

    I have already quoted three verses of Scripture that clearly shows that physical death came into the world through Adam's sin. You are demonstrating that you don't believe what those verses clearly state, so you are not convincing me that you actually believe the Bible at all. So you can try...
  14. Paul Christensen

    Heresy within Christianity

    It is interesting that you are not prepared to accept that the top evolutionists can't provide any scientific proof that can be observed that one species can change to another through evolution. So, God creating each species after its own kind is wrong then? Has the formation of these species...
  15. Paul Christensen

    Is this good for Christianity?

    I see you are an agnostic. What do you think will happen to you when you die?
  16. Paul Christensen

    Is this good for Christianity?

    I asked you a simple, direct question. Why can't you answer it?
  17. Paul Christensen

    The Great Deception

    You didn't get around to answering my first question. Here is the point. Creationism is a religion based on faith, which has its object in what the Bible says about it. Evolution is also a religion based on faith, because it can't be conclusively proved by the scientific method, which is...
  18. Paul Christensen

    Heresy within Christianity

    But genetic studies have shown that apes have so many differences in their genetic code from humans that there is no way they could mutate into humans through genetic means. Actually, the fruit fly has more similarities in its genetic code to humans, it it would be more likely that a fruit...
  19. Paul Christensen

    Heresy within Christianity

    So, you can't really answer why Adam previously was immortal, and then became mortal and physically died 900 years later? I think you are trapped between a rock and a hard place. If you say that physical death existed in the millions of years before Adam, and this is the basis of evolution -...
  20. Paul Christensen

    Heresy within Christianity

    I watched a video where four of the top evolutionist academics in the United States were asked to provide substantive observable evidence to support the actual change from one kind of species to another, and none of them could provide it. I saw them squirming and desperately trying to think of...