Search results

No, He died for all... who believe on Him as God's promised Savior. He is not just Lord and King over Israel, but also over the Gentiles. The dividing point is about those who believe on Him, vs. those who do not. That is what determines who He saves.

In other words, you are asking folks here that believe in a FALSE Pre-trib Rapture theory LIKE YOU DO, to discuss with you pre-trib's FALSE BELIEF that Israel and the Church are separate. It's not hard to decipher what you're up to, which really is just looking for a chance here to push false...

The OP is ALL TETHERS OF MAN. (A tether is like a rope hooked to a post in the ground with the other end tied to an animal.) Men's seminary doctrines are tethers that will 'limit' one's Bible understanding from God. Follow God's Word line upon line, precept upon precept, here a little and...

Well, your theory just falls apart all over the place, because you show you don't actually know the Scriptures about the "tares" subject! The good wheat in the parable of the tares of the field represents Judah, true bloodline Jews. The "tares" represent the children of the devil, that the...

Talk about straining at a gnat! Jesus Christ died on the cross for ALL those born in the flesh, WITHOUT EXCEPTION. The difference is that EACH MUST choose The Father and believe on His Son's death and resurrection for the remission of sin, and then get baptized in Him. Those who reject Him...

Sounds like confusion. Christ's Church is made up of both believing Israelites, and believing Gentiles, both together as one body. Any ideas of separation among His Church is a teaching of the devil. Per John 5:28-29, both the resurrection of life, and the resurrection of damnation, happen on...

There's that example of how Pre-trib Rapture theory folks chop up their Bible to suit them. The "wrath" Apostle Paul was pointing to in 1 Thessalonians 5:9 that those in Christ are not appointed to, is about GOD's WRATH on the LAST DAY of this world. And it will end the great tribulation...

EVERY case of that "day of the Lord" warning in the Old Testament prophets is always... about the LAST DAY of this present world. Folks like you just are not given to understand how God uses the old destructions in OT history as 'types' for the very end "sudden destruction" that Apostle Paul...

Understanding that will only come by covering all the relevant Bible Scripture, and through prayer. The first death should be obvious, it is the death of our flesh body. The "second death" also should be obvious, since we are told it is the casting into the future "lake of fire" along with...

The book, or scroll, with seven seals shown in Revelation 5, which only Christ was found worthy to open, represents the 7 main Signs of the end leading up to His return. That is why The Lamb (Jesus) is shown opening the Seals beginning in Revelation 6. So no, that "book" (or scroll) is not...

All the above, including those small references to the New Testament, is based solely on the Old Testament idea that the soul part is a material thing associated with flesh life. That is a traditional JEWISH belief that the Jews have held for centuries, i.e., that the soul does not continue in...

However, don't forget what Apostle Paul taught in Romans 11 about the unbelievers of Israel, that God blinded them, and their spiritual blindness won't be removed until the fullness of the Gentiles is complete. So they reject Christ in ignorance during this world, but at Christ's return they...

Nah, your accusation is false. It only shows your lack of Biblical understanding, and instead doctrines of men. Your statement in bold red above, reveals that you are like the Judaites of Acts 15 that were trying to force Gentiles to get flesh circumcised or they could not be saved by Lord...

Because the last verse of Revelation 17 tells us the symbolic "woman" of that Chapter is a "great city", the royalty idea is more about her rule over the ten horns, seven heads, and ten crowns which Rev.17 associates her with. It's about Jerusalem in a fallen worship state when the pseudo-Christ...

So what? In Ezekiel 16, God referred to Jerusalem as a harlot committing whoredoms. Did He literally mean the city of Jerusalem is a "harlot" per your view? Learn when God's Word is using symbolic speech to get a point across, instead of trying be a legalist lawyer in God's Word.

The real fact of the matter, is that truly Jesus was sent to the lost sheep of the "house of Israel", and in that time of His 1st coming, who really were... those of the "house of Israel"? That title at that time belonged only to the ten lost tribes of Israel, not to the "house of Judah"... Jer...

But Paul claimed both, as an Israelite born of the tribe of Benjamin, and also as a Jew. By his claiming both puts the term 'Jew' in proper perspective as also a 'region' title, like Californian. It's not unlike the usage of the term Christian today; anyone can be a Christian simply by accepting...

What you actually have to consider is the 1 Kings 11 events of when God rent Israel from Solomon's son Rehoboam. Only the tribe of Benjamin sided with the tribe of Judah in Jerusalem/Judea, as written. When God setup Jeroboam of the tribe of Ephraim as king over Israel in the north at Samaria...

I disagree, as I have already shown, Paul's claim to be an Israelite (or Jew) was that he was born of the tribe of Benjamin, and thus a bloodline Israelite. Without that birth there would have been no need for his flesh circumcision. See, I never disagreed that Paul was circumcised, being a Jew...

You need to go back farther than that in Bible history. When God led the children of Israel out of Egypt and into Canaan, the lands of promise, He told them to wipe out literally seven nations of Canaan because of their iniquity. He showed with Abraham that He had given the Canaanites 430 years...