Search results

Please don't ask me dumb questions. No scripture is spurious, of course. Did you think I might actually answer yes to that question? If it was a resurrection unto bodily immortality then he would have included it in 1 Corinthians 15:22-23 where he gave the order of resurrections unto bodily...

This is a classic case of the blind leading the blind. The word "generation" never refers to the human life span. Your dishonest treatment of scripture is disgusting. You even will resort to creating your own definitions for words to make it say what you want it to say, which is just pathetic.

The only thing I agree with in this entire thread.

An 1024 year long generation? LOL. And I thought Doug's claim that it's 70 years long was ridiculous. But, this takes it to another level. You guys really need to ask God for wisdom (James 1:5-7) instead of just coming up with nonsense in your imaginations.

I don't know what you're trying to say here. You're telling me to address this, but you didn't even address what I said in my post #263. So, can you address what I said first?

Pretrib is officially dead and has been for awhile. No pretrib has given even one single coherent argument after all this time it has been discussed in multiple threads. Literally nothing but childish insults and complete gibberish from them. That's it. It's the weakest doctrine imaginable.

If they were resurrected with immortal bodies then Paul would have mentioned that when he gave the order of bodily resurrections unto immortality, but he didn't. So, they must have died again later like Lazarus did. 1 Corinthians 15:22 For as in Adam all die, even so in Christ shall all be made...

The NASB teaches the deity of Christ. Since you believe it is wrong about that, how do you trust it about anything? On the fact that it's not talking about a literal building, but rather is figuratively talking about God's people collectively, which we call the church. It's not beside the...

You are misinterpreting all of those verses. Congrats on your consistency. Take that last verse, for example. No more utter destruction after Christ returns? Don't you believe the following occurs at the end of the thousand years (or end of Satan's little season)? 2 Petr 3:10 But the day of the...

He did say that, but his only response when I question it is to claim that I supposedly made a straw man argument, which I did not. In his premil view the the meek shall inherit the earth, but only temporarily until it is burned up. In amil the meek shall inherit the (renewed/new) earth for...

LOL. You are so delusional. Just claiming that everything proves Amil is false proves nothing except that you are not able to actually back up anything you say.

You're just using this as an excuse to get out of addressing my points. And you talk about my insults? You are a hypocrite. You say this without even addressing the OT passage that Paul referenced which shows that both believers and unbelievers will be bowing the knee before the Lord. Why...

Premil comes from the book of fairy tales. It's a fairy tale about a pointless period of time when there is peace on earth for a thousand years only for Satan to ruin it all in short order as if he is all powerful.

Weak response. Have we just had a thousand years of peace in the world before today with Christ on the earth in all His glory?

I explain my understanding of what it means to have part in the first resurrection and I clearly say that people having part in the resurrection is not fulfilled in the past, so you don't tell the whole story of what Amils believe. Why is that? Because you're a liar perhaps? I think so. You...

The point is that's not how it's supposed to be during the premil thousand years of peace. LOL. This is just another way for you to share your gibberish. Tell me how it can be that Satan can deceive a number of people "as the sand of sea" who had just experienced a thousand year of peace on the...

Since you make so many straw man arguments, this is not surprising that you would understand that very well. The worst straw man argument you make is when you try to act as if Amils believe that the physical/bodily resurrection of the dead in Christ has already occurred, which we do NOT...

I know what you said, Straw Man King. You're not even addressing what I said. The rest of the dead do NOT include believers. Hello? They are contrasted with dead believers who have had part in the first resurrection. Why did Paul not include those who would die during a supposed future...

So, what translation do you use? Is this a hard question? What's lively is what the stones represent and they represent Christians who are in the church. It talks about them being built into a spiritual house which matches Paul's description of the church in Ephesians 2:19-22 where he talks...

Right. So, he's trying to find any excuse he can to avoid answering those questions, including trying to make us out to be the bad guys despite him falsely accusing us of being the same person just because he can't imagine two people agreeing on things since no one agrees with him about...