Search results

If neither have wine or oil to pour in his wounds then both are only men pleasers

God.

Antichrist is anything that opposes Christ. What I’m saying is this was me prior to his reign on the throne of my heart. This is literal and spiritual for me. I read the left behind series years ago and I believe I’ve heard about every escatalogical explanation there is look at this Psalm...

Let’s look at this one, since I’ve personally experienced it. That man of sin was/is me, that’s right, there I was sitting on his rightful throne opposing and exalting myself above all that is called God. But then he that was preventing was taken out of the way. Praise God. Could it be that...

It’s funny to hear you guys talk about people being actors the def of the word actor is hypocrite and the def of the word Sabbath is intermission which is a pause or a break in a play.

Guess I’ll be staying here.

To display Christ and His Church

We’ve already inherited the land. To those that are in Christ all things have been made new (new heaven new earth)

Only thing I would say here is isn’t marriage an institution of God?

I don’t have an answer

You know, I’ve made a mistake trying to communicate with you again. It will not happen again

And my salvation is not based in your understanding of scripture.

Done told you, already been judged.

One thing I’ve learned today from God speaking truth is that I no longer have to please man. I’m free to please God and in Christ He’s pleased, could this not also be found in a homosexual?

Maybe it’s best I don’t respond to this anymore?

It stands in opposition to His display of redemption. Which at the same time in some creepy way it’s also in conjunction. Being I’m a man he’s in me and I’m in Him

No Scott is not disputing this. You need to be more specific in what your saying. I could argue based on scripture that Christ is in my flesh.

Nobody is disputing this.

You do realize that there a different kinds of flesh

Bottom line is we’re free to please God now.