Search results

No. It’s because YHWH put his words in Jesus mouth as he said he’d do at Deut 18:15-18.

Putting aside the clown comment, numerous men in Scripture were worshipped - Nebuchadnezzar, Daniel and David. Doesn’t make them God.

I think it is the healthy, positive and proper way to look at it. The other day I listened to sport fanatics delve into minutia of who was the GOAT in a certain sport. These grown men invest their passion in irrelevant matters. By contrast, my neighbor is an active member of a local church...

Sad and goes to show the importance of translation cross reference. 3 of my preferred translations are in the first group. However, my understanding of text is the practicing, 2nd group. Perhaps the study notes led me to a proper grasp of God’s word - in addition to the spirit of God.

Do you think God, Jesus’ Father, YHWH, meant to glorify his son over his own name? If so, it’d be odd that he exempts himself in all who is under Jesus’ authority.

No. I think you know that is not what I nor Scripture is saying.

Ernest, I applaud your analysis. Many others have expressed similar sentiments but behold is a OSAS to the core. He does not have eyes to see or ears to here.

So, you believe universalism is correct doctrine? It logically follows from your claim that Christ alone gets people to heaven, which necessarily means nothing on the part of the person is required. A statement of faith? No. An actual heart felt believe? No. Actions consisten with the will of...

Implied is that you believe this translation can hold up to scrutiny? Other than it fits your doctrine, do you have any factual basis for holding this translation has it correct but other have it wrong? For the record, I declare that Jesus is Lord. Note what else the verse says this...

Oh, how delightful! Scripture that explicitly states that God made Jesus - both, lord and Messiah - does not mean that but I am advocating something false. Please enlighten us without relying on pseudo-grammatical arguments yourself.

Discernment brother. By definition, "works" is external and not a basis of salvation so no man may brag. Of course, it takes humiliation or the work of humbling oneself to recognize the need for a savior. Generally, a drowning man does not credit himself with grabbing hold of the rope, which...

Not responsive to the Scriture which Jesus God made Jesus - both, lord and Messiah. This is not equivalent to God making himself lord and messiah. God made somebody else, some other being these things. Isn’t that what Acts 2:36 says?

It is work but not works in the Biblical sense. The former is internal while the latter is external.

This post shows the effectiveness of propaganda. You should never believe your own propaganda. Excerpts from Conservapedia: Essay: 7 reasons the Republicans should end funding the war in Ukraine immediately if they win control of the U.S Congress in the 2022 midterms 1. Ukraine war...

Which is to say there will be no cost to Russia at all. :confused:

Except for all the evidence, there is no evidence for God. The unassailable position of Atheists.

Of course Christ is created! Acts 2:36 says so explicitly. I specifically asked you about this and it means nothing to you. We are done here.

Empirical science. Empirical evidence means nothing to you.

Rather than tell me you already answered this question, try actually answering the question. Can you explain how anything can be with what it is and be the same thing? Logic, language usage and definition. If I say that I am an American and am with an American, that means there are 2 Beings.

No. They are grammatical not doctrinal. Reating this strawman does not make it so.