Search results

Isaiah 55:11, which YOU quoted, but did not show the difference with how God was using the idea of prosper there, was misleading. That is why I noted it.

Mark 1:4-5 4 John did baptize in the wilderness, and preach the baptism of repentance for the remission of sins. 5 And there went out unto him all the land of Judaea, and they of Jerusalem, and were all baptized of him in the river of Jordan, confessing their sins. KJV Wycliffe on Matt 3:5-6...

Isa 45:18 18 For thus saith the LORD That created the heavens; God Himself That formed the earth and made it; He hath established it, He created it not in vain, He formed it to be inhabited: I am the LORD; and there is none else. KJV By the way, that Hebrew for "in vain" is the same Hebrew word...

But the idea of prosperity the OP is talking about is in regard to material wealth, not God's idea of prosperity of the success of His Word going forth and being fulfilled. Those following the 'prosperity' preachers are deceived. But go ahead, they need more private jets and swimming pools...

Yes, water baptism is necessary, for those who are able and have no excuse. That means the majority of us. Our Lord Jesus set the example, so there's no reason (except in a near death state) to not do it. And it's actually kind of silly to deny it, since it has ever been part of Christian...

Well, you're getting closer to what Paul said, but you failed to include these verses where Apostle Paul nailed what the "spiritual body" is... 1 Cor 15:44-50 44 It is sown a natural body; it is raised a spiritual body. There is a natural body, and there is a spiritual body. 45 And so it is...

You cannot just slap the context of John 3 everywhere else. I well understand Jesus was speaking of the water of woman's womb in John 3. But you cannot just slap that context into Peter's command in Acts 2. 1 Cor 1:13-17 13 Is Christ divided? was Paul crucified for you? or were ye baptized in...

It is YOUR carnal nature that is NOT allowing The Holy Spirit to get through to you. When Acts 2 says each person there heard in their OWN dialects of their language of birth, that means a 'natural hearing' just like everyday speech! YOU are falsely trying to make it something else, simply...

No! It is YOU that is totally out of line with your vain babbling false accusations! You show you are not to be trusted with God's Word. Your credibility in God's Word is completely shot.

Yes, I'm aware of those roots, and more. The Communists have control pretty much of most of the Democratic party in the U.S., and they have been working on the Republican party also, which is why we see Republican moderates voting for Leftist policies too. 1958 Communist goal #15 was to capture...

That command accompanies the act of water baptism. That is what Peter was telling them to do. There is no reason to exclude it there.

Yes, way... too far out. The flaming Cherubim in Genesis 3 represent God removing His Adobe off this earth where it once was, as shown in Genesis 2. Those Cherubim are guardians of the Tree of Life in God's Garden, which today is in another dimension of existence. The passing through the fire...

Yet water baptism is important, and our Lord Jesus set the example for us. The malefactor on the cross didn't have the opportunity to get baptized, so our Lord Jesus is able to save also without water baptism. Someone on their deathbed just before they die that has a change of heart and believes...

Just so others are aware... the 45 strategic goals of Soviet Communism from their 1958 long-range strategy included the use of psychological authority to get control over the population. This included influencing the schools. From 1950's ex-FBI agent Cleon Skousen's book The Naked Communist...

You are the one who made up fallacies and wild speculations in your post #186 while trying to be sly, as if you were not pointing your finger. If you are going to throw junk out of your mouth like that then you best be prepared to hear rebuke in return. Your RCC defamers idea is another fallacy...

Amazing how you keep skirting the actual Scriptures in question which I have shown, 2 Cor.11, Luke 23:27-30, Isaiah 54, Luke 21:22-23.

It was NOT gibberish, not even for a second. The Acts 2 chapter is clear, those present heard in their OWN DIALECTS of their languages of birth! You can keep denying that in favor of a gibberish unknown tongue that is not in God's Word, but you will be going against God's Word in Acts 2. That...

My previous post 21 outlines the meaning of the cloven tongue of Pentecost per Acts 2 to show it was dialects of languages the peoples heard the Apostles speak, not some gibberish unknown tongue. Now because I won't play your silly game, you falsely claim I don't have the 'fruit of the Holy...

I'm not going to play silly games with you. If you really wanted to know what God's Word shows about the cloven tongue you would have admitted that evidence in Acts 2 by now. But your words show you are not interested in the evidence in God's Word, but instead would rather follow what men's...

Go back and look at my posts, which is where you will find it. You might start with post #21 here in this thread.